Edward Stanley

Edward Stanley

Edward Stanley blev født i 1775. Buxton i Mount Street i Manchester den 16. august 1819. Stanley var i samme hus som William Hulton, William Hay og de andre magistrater. Stanley observerede Peterloo -massakren fra rummet umiddelbart over den, hvor magistraterne var samlet med udsigt over Peterskirken.

I april 1822 afgav pastor Edward Stanley vidnesbyrd ved Hugh Birley -retssagen i Lancaster. Stanley, der senere blev biskop i Norwich, døde i 1849.

.

Fra vinduet så jeg en lille tumult blandt en tilskuerkrop, hovedsageligt kvinder, der indtog en høj af hævet, ødelagt grund til venstre og bag på talerne, overbeviste mig om, at de så noget, der ophidsede deres frygt; mange sprang ned, og de spredte sig hurtigt hurtigere. På dette tidspunkt spredte alarmen sig hurtigt, og jeg hørte flere stemmer udbryde: "Soldaterne! Soldaterne! Et andet øjeblik bragte kavaleriet ind i feltet på en galop, som de fortsatte, indtil ordet blev givet for at standse dem, omkring midten af pladsen, som jeg før bemærkede, var delvist besat af slyngler.

Kavaleriet stoppede i stor uorden, og sådan fortsatte de få minutter, de blev på det sted. Uorden blev af flere personer i lokalet tilskrevet deres hestes udisciplinerede tilstand, lidt vant til at handle sammen og sandsynligvis skræmt af befolkningens råb, der hilste deres ankomst velkommen.

En betjent og nogle få andre avancerede derefter snarere foran troppen, dannede sig i meget uorden og med næsten ikke linjens skinn, deres sabler glimtede i luften, og de gik videre, direkte til hustingerne. Først, dvs. et par skridt, var deres bevægelse ikke hurtig, men de øgede hurtigt deres hastighed og med en iver og iver, som man naturligvis kunne forvente af mænd, der handlede med delegeret magt mod en fjende, som man ved, at de havde blevet fornærmet med hån af fejhed, fortsatte deres forløb og syntes individuelt at kæmpe med hinanden, hvilket skulle være først.

Da kavaleriet nærmede sig den tætte masse mennesker, brugte de deres yderste bestræbelser på at flygte: men så tæt blev de presset i modsatte retninger af soldaterne, de særlige konstabler, hustingernes position og deres eget enorme antal, at øjeblikkelig flugt var umulig.

Da de ankom til hustingsne, opstod der en scene med frygtelig forvirring. Rederne faldt eller blev tvunget af stilladset hurtigt efter hinanden. Hunt blev trukket så hurtigt som muligt ned ad den allé, der kommunikerede med magistratenes hus; hans medarbejdere skyndte sig efter ham på lignende måde. På dette tidspunkt var der opstået så meget støv, at der ikke kan gives en præcis redegørelse for, hvad der yderligere fandt sted på det pågældende sted.

Jeg så intet, der gav mig en idé om modstand, undtagen på et eller to steder, hvor de viste en vis tilbøjelighed til at opgive deres bannere; disse impulser var imidlertid kun kortvarige; deres pinde, så vidt det faldt under min observation, var almindelige vandrestokke. Jeg har hørt fra den mest respektable myndighed, at kavaleriet blev angrebet af sten i den korte tid, de stoppede forud for deres anklager. Jeg så bestemt ikke noget af den slags, og mine øjne var mest stadigt rettet mod dem, og jeg tror, ​​at jeg må have set en sten større end en småsten på den korte afstand, hvor jeg stod, og med den befalende udsigt, jeg havde. Jeg så faktisk ingen missilvåben brugt under hele transaktionen, men som jeg tidligere har sagt, skjulte støvet ved hustingsne snart delvist alt, hvad der fandt sted i nærheden af ​​det pågældende sted, men uden tvivl forsvarede folket sig efter bedste evne , da det var absolut umuligt for dem at komme væk og give kavaleriet en klar passage, indtil den ydre del af pøblen var faldet tilbage.


Edward Stanley

Stanley var en murer, der boede på 1 Osborn Place, Brick Lane og blev rygter om at være en tidligere soldat, der trak pension fra Essex-regimentet. Retsdommers jury ønskede, at Stanley blev kaldt til retssagen, da de følte, at han måske havde lidt lys at bære på den kuvertstykke, der blev fundet af Chapmans lig, der havde toppen af ​​Sussex -regimentet på sig.

Han havde kendt Annie Chapman i omkring to år og nogle gange betalt for hendes seng i Crossingham's Lodging House (han ville også lejlighedsvis betale for Eliza Coopers seng. Han var på frivillig tjeneste i Fort Elson, Gosport med 2. brigade, Southern Division, Hampshire Militia fra 6. august til 1. september 1888 og havde sidst set Chapman den 2. september mellem klokken 13.00 og 15.00. Han sagde, at hun ved denne lejlighed havde to ringe på den ene af sine fingre og havde et lidt sorte øje.

På morddagen gik Stanley til Crossingham for at kontrollere en historie, han havde hørt fra en sko-sort, at Annie var blevet dræbt, hvorefter han syntes at have så lidt at gøre med den afdøde som muligt.

Da han blev spurgt af dødsadvokaten, om han var pensionist, svarede han "Jeg er ikke pensionist og har ikke været i Essex -regimentet. Det, jeg siger, vil blive offentliggjort overalt i Europa. Jeg har mistet 5 timer i at komme her".


SMITH STANLEY, Edward, Lord Stanley (1775-1851), fra Upper Grovsenor Street, Mdx.

Kol. 2 R. Lancs. milits 1797 brevet kol. 1797-1802.

Biografi

Stanley, en ihærdig, men iøjnefaldende Whig, var bedre kendt som naturhistoriker og samler end som politiker. I dette blev han hæmmet af hans stigende døvhed, dårlige udseende og lange periode som arving. Hans far, hvis valginteresser han havde tilsyn med, var leder af den mest magtfulde familie i Lancashire, hvor han var herreløjtnant, påvirkede valget i Lancaster og Liverpool og returnerede et Preston og et amtsmedlem. Omtales nænsomt af kolleger som & lsquoTongs & rsquo på grund af sin ekstreme tyndhed, store hoved og lange lemmer (et kaldenavn bevidst misforstået, da det blev publiceret af Henry Hunt*), var Stanley et klogt, temmelig samvittighedsfuldt medlem, der delte Derby & rsquos pro-katolske sympati og forbehold om reformer og var stolte over udvalgte udvalgsarbejde og håndtering af familie- og valgkredsvirksomheder i parlamentet. Efter Peterloo -massakren kritiserede både radikaler og Tories hans målte forsvar for Manchester -magistraterne, Lancashires store jury (som han var formand for om sommeren) og Lancaster gaoler Higgins, og han frier også kontroverser ved at nægte at fordømme Liverpool direkte Ministry & rsquos repressive & lsquoSix Acts & rsquo.1 Med Peterloo -retsforfølgelser, herunder Hunt, der verserer, og hans ældste søn, den kommende premierminister Edward George Geoffrey Smith Stanley*, for ung til at bestride Preston efter hensigten, kom folketingsvalget i 1820 på et vanskeligt tidspunkt for Stanley. Han greb ikke ind i Lancaster eller Liverpool, sikrede sit tredje hjemkomst til Lancashire med excentrikken Tory John Blackburne efter en token-meningsmåling og bistod sin svoger Edmund Hornby* i Preston, hvor deres interesse sejrede i en hård konkurrence, der involverede Hunt .2

Stanley holdt sig til den største Whig -opposition i parlamentet fra 1820. Som fast taler om Lancashire -spørgsmål udfordrede han lejlighedsvis ministre i debat, men han var ikke en god taler og blev formørket i denne periode af Edward. De var ofte forvirrede i rapporter om parlamentariske procedurer efter sidstnævnte & rsquos -tilbagevenden til Stockbridge om Grosvenor -interessen i 1822. Stanley & rsquos -støtte til 1820 og 1821 parlamentariske kampagner på vegne af dronning Caroline var ustabil, selvom han som sin far holdt ham informeret om udviklingen i Lords indrømmede han privat, at dronningen var uærlig pris, 31. januar 1821. Han delte for katolsk nødhjælp, 28. februar 1821, 1. marts, 21. april, 10. maj 1825. Han frembragte en 10.000-underskrift Manchester pro-katolsk andragende, 10. maj 1825, modsagde han kravet foretaget af hjemmesekretæren Peel, da han forelagde en rivaliserende andragende, om at Lancashire overvejende var antikatolsk. Han stemte for at gøre Leeds til en skotsk og meget bydel i henhold til loven om frakendelse af Grampound, 2. marts 1821, vel vidende at bomuldsbyerne Manchester og Salford, der også eftertragtede Grampound & rsquos -sæder, ville acceptere en franchise, der var mere behagelig for Lords.4 Han delte for Lord John Russell & rsquos reformforslag, 9. maj 1821 (men ikke Lambton & rsquos, 18. apr.), og igen til reform, 25. april 1822, 24. april, 2. juni 1823, 26. februar 1824, 27. april 1826. Han vedhæftede & lsquogreat betydning & rsquo for kandidater & rsquo -tilstedeværelse ved valg og hadede forestillingen om valglokaler efter distrikter, 20. april 1826.5 Han stemte til fordømmelse af valgbestikkelse, 26. maj 1826.

Stanley var hovedtaler og majoritetstæller for at have taget printeren Robert Thomas Weaver i forvaring efter forespørgsel bekræftede inddragelsen af ​​Lord Londonderry (Castlereagh) i John Bull& rsquos injurier om Henry Gray Bennet, 11. maj. 1821. Efter hans tjeneste i udvalgte udvalg i 1817 og 1818 havde han udviklet en stor interesse for de fattige love og tilhørende spørgsmål, og han fremlagde og godkendte andragender fra Lancashire og andre steder mod de dårlige lovforslag fra 1821 og 1822, 4., 6. juni 1821 , 13., 20., 31. maj 1822, da han, som i 1824 og efterfølgende, var medlem af det udvalgte udvalg og planlagde lovgivning om uklarhed.6 Canning scotched hans forsøg på at genere regeringen over tilsyneladende mangler og uoverensstemmelser i diplomatisk korrespondance forelagt for House, 24. april. Han benægtede forslag om, at Manchester-andragende på 30.000 underskrifter om afskaffelse af kolonialt slaveri (et af mange, han bragte i 1824 og 1826) var en forfalskning, 31. marts 1824.7 Han undgik at erklære sine synspunkter om afskaffelse den dag , men godkendte lignende andragender, 24., 27. maj, 1. juni og parret til fordømmelse af anklageskriftet i Demerara for metodistmissionæren John Smith, 11. juni 1824.8

Stanley påtog sig langt den største andel af valgkredsvirksomheden og fremlagde over 120 Lancashire -andragender i parlamentet i 1820.9 Genoplivningen i 1820 af parlamentarikskampagnen på vegne af Peterloo -radikalerne bragte fornyet kritik af Derby & rsquos amtsforvaltning og hans egen adfærd, men han afviste let den radikale George Dewhurst & rsquos påstande om mishandling i Lancaster gaol, 31. maj 1820. Han var ikke i stand til at forhindre gaoler & rsquos i at levere breve til den dømte Nathaniel Broadhurst den sommer under æren af ​​William James fra at gyde brud på privilegier, der, selv om den blev besejret (med 86-33), 7. mar. 1821 og (inden 167-60), 25. februar 1822, testede ham alvorligt. Han indrømmede ved begge lejligheder, at der muligvis var et brud på den moralske retfærdighed, men ikke en lov & rsquo. The Tory Preston Sentinel roste hans tale fra 1822. 10 Andragender, der blev bragt på vegne af Peterloo -veteranerne, 15. maj 1821, udfordrede også hans kompetence, og han var sikker på, at den ville blive besejret, og han stemte for at give efter forespørgsel til & lsquodraw en linje under spørgsmålet & rsquo, 16. maj. Han gentog sit forsvar for den store jury, da et Liverpool -andragende anførte dets valg og oligarkiske sammensætning som faktorer i manglen på at bringe Manchester -jomfruen for retten & rsquo, 12. juni 1823. Da han accepterede sheriffen Thomas Greene & rsquos* opfordring til at præsidere ved sommeren, siger han skrev bagefter:

Han forpurrede Liverpool & rsquos-bud (1822-34) om at erstatte Lancaster, da Lancashire & rsquos assisterede byen og konsoliderede sin succes i 1822-3 ved at bære 1824 Judges & rsquo Lodging Act, som sikrede, at faciliteterne i Lancaster forblev tilstrækkelige.12 Alligevel forblev han som gidsel for kritik af politiske rivaler og forurettede promotorer af lokale regninger, som han modsatte sig eller på anden måde undlod at bære. Da et partipolitisk andragende, som blev overdraget til Sir James Mackintosh fra Manchester -advokaten William Walker, anklagede ham for inkompetence som formand for det udvalgte udvalg om Manchester -gaslysregningen, tog det Edward's snilde i sin jomfrutale at spare ham forlegenheden over da han så det accepteret, 30. mar. 1824. Han klarede sig bedre, da Edward Curteis, som han påpegede sjældent havde deltaget i udvalget, fornyede forsøget, 8. april 1824.13 Han havde også svært ved at håndtere Salford hundrede retsregning, som Bootle Wilbraham modsatte sig regeringen, den 13. maj 1822 lånefirmaet til lånefirmaet Manchester og Salford, som handelsformandens Huskisson fordømte, den 10. maj 1824, og Rochdale -vejen, den 1. marts 1825. Lowthers gjorde ham til syndebuk for fiaskoen 1825 Liverpool-Manchester jernbaneregning, som Derby modsatte sig i Lords, og han måtte udholde alvorlig kritik i pressen for ikke at promovere den, da den blev vedtaget i 1826.14 Han havde også problemer ved at bevise, at hans tale, der støttede Lancashire grand jury & rsquos andragende om revision af spillovene, 20. april, hvor han angiveligt kritiserede myndighederne ved at fastslå, at Lancashire blev stadig mere lovløs, var blevet fejlrapporteret, selvom han rejste sagen i Hus, hvor Bootle Wilbraham samledes til hans bistand, 9. maj 1826.15

Stanley & rsquos & lsquoliberal & rsquo -erklæringer om handel blev generelt tilpasset valgkretsinteresser og blev ofte godkendt af Huskisson, efter hans valg til Liverpool i 1823. Han gentog Manchester Chamber of Commerce & rsquos anmodninger om lempelse af kommercielle restriktioner, 19. maj 1820, 1. mar. 1821, 20. maj 1822 ligeledes deres indvendinger mod at øge tolden på østindiske sukkerarter, som han ignorerede finansministerens afvisningskansler Vansittart & rsquos, insisterede på var et trick til at hjælpe vestindiske interesser, 4. maj 1821. Han beordrede papirer til at bevise dette, 7. maj 1821, støttede lignende andragender, 3. maj 1822, 9. maj og stemte for forespørgsel, 22. maj 1823.16 Han kunne være afhængig af at støtte calico printere & rsquo -kampagnen for lavere opgaver, 29. juni 1820,17 og modsætte sig lastbilsystemet, som han sidestillede med livegenskab , 17. juni 1822, men han ville ikke tilslutte sig bønnen fra Manchester bomuldsarbejderne og rsquo -andragende, der tilskrev deres nød til nye maskiner, 25. april. Han gjorde det klart at han ikke overvejede at ophæve kombinationslovene som et passende emne for et privat medlem & rsquos -lovforslag, 27. maj 1823, opfordrede til & lsquocaution & rsquo om at fremlægge andragender, der opfordrede det, 15. marts, 14. april 1824 og advarede Joseph Hume, der bar 1824 ophæve regning, af de & lsquopersonlige risici for producenter, der vidner om kombinationer og faren, som de ville blive udsat for ved ophævelse af de eksisterende love & rsquo. Han nægtede at godkende andragender mod deres delvise genindførelse, 25. april 1825.18 utilfreds med regeringens og rsquos politik, fremlagde han andragender om ophævelse eller revision af majslovgivningen, 22. april 1825, 23., 27. februar, 7. april, og stemte til forespørgsel, 18. april 1826. Støtter en positiv begæring fra Bury, den 5. maj, og han sagde, at han ikke havde nogen mening i at frigive bunden majs uden beskatning, da forhandlere ville være de eneste modtagere, og foreslog at opkræve tolden fuldt ud og trække på indtægter, der blev genereret således til at finansiere arbejdet i Udvalget for Bekæmpelse af de Nødstillede Fabrikanter.19 Udvinding og omkostninger optog ham ved folketingsvalget i 1826, hvor afskedigelser inden for fremstilling, majslovreform og katolsk nødhjælp var de vigtigste spørgsmål. Han undgik snævert en seriøs konkurrence, der blev fremmet af Lowthers i amtet, og Edward toppede en 15-dages meningsmåling i Preston, hvor deres koalition med selskabet Tories var kollapset.20

Mellem januar og april 1827 korresponderede Stanley, der hidtil havde delt katolsk nødhjælp, 6. marts 1827 (og igen 12. maj 1828) regelmæssigt med sine vælgere og kolleger om bistand til de deprimerede områder, majs, East India Company & rsquos handelsmonopol , lokal lovgivning, protektion og den forventede overførsel af Penryn & rsquos -sæder til Manchester. Han tilskrev sit sjældne fremmøde på dette tidspunkt til sin far & rsquos gigt og familieproblemer.21 Hans bemærkninger om fremlæggelse af andragender til revision af majsloven, 19., 26. februar, 6. marts 1827, blev urapporteret.22 Han stemte imod øget beskyttelse af byg, 12. marts og for at udsætte forsyninger i afventning af løsning af arvefølgen til Lord Liverpool som premier 30. marts og gik over til regeringen med sin familie, efter at Canning tiltrådte 1. maj. 23 Forventede indrømmelser på Penryn, pressede han Manchester & rsquos sag enfranchisement, 8. maj, da han ærligt erkendte lokale forskelle på den foretrukne vælgerkvalifikationstærskel, opfordrede til anklager mod dem, der var skyldige i bestikkelse i Penryn og udtrykte utilfredshed med udsigten til at sluse franchisen der. Han skrev den 27. april til advokaten i Manchester, George William Wood, og foreslog en husmands kvalifikation på

Han fremlagde og godkendte Manchester & rsquos andragende om enfranchising & lsquopopulous byer & rsquo, inden han stemte for at fjerne Penryn, 28. maj, og kontaktede efterfølgende Manchester -delegationen. Vestindisk produktion, 21. maj og ophævelse af testlovene, 28., 30., 31. maj, 6. juni, 26. og introducerede andre for lønregulering, 18. maj og assisteret emigration, 21. maj 1827.27 Han repræsenterede ejerne af Lancashire -colliery, han kaldte til ændring af loven om vægte og foranstaltninger og foreslog, at regeringen skulle sponsorere lovgivning for at aflaste amtet for de høje omkostninger for de irske fattige, 22. juni 1827.28 Udsigten til at Edward sluttede sig til juniorrækkerne i Canning & rsquos administration og hans egen forhøjelse til Lords var gik ind i juli, men de havde lidt attraktion for Stanley. Til sin far, der så det på samme måde, forklarede han:

Han nægtede at give Canning tilladelse til at flytte Preston-skriften inden recessen og frarådede Edward fra at skynde sig for at tage plads i statskassen.29 Efter Canning & rsquos død og efter at have rådført sig med Lord Lansdowne, godkendte han Edward & rsquos udnævnelse som undersekretær for Huskisson ved kolonialen embede i Lord Goderich & rsquos koalitionsministerium. 30 På vej til familiegrænsen fulgte han ikke det indgående Wellington -ministerium i januar 1828, men han forsinkede at gå i direkte opposition, indtil Penryn & rsquos skæbne var blevet bestemt, hvilket faldt sammen med Huskissonit -løsrivelsen.

Han fremlagde gunstige andragender, 15., 22., 25. februar, og stemte for at ophæve testlovene, 26. februar 1828. Han fremkom andragender om katolsk lettelse 22. april, 9. maj 1828. Han blev instrueret i at bringe den aborterende Penryn ind fratrædelsesregning med Lord John Russell og Manchester bomuldsproducenten Sir George Philips, 31. januar, og modsatte sig forgæves den dertil knyttede skadesløsholdelseslov, den 2., 3. april. Han stemte imod at sluse franchisen i East Retford, 21. mar. regning, 27. juni. Han rejste andragender om ophævelse af Maltloven, 31. mar., Mod lovforslaget om venlige samfund, 18. april, 9. maj, for at tillade anatomisk dissektion, 22. april, 13. maj og opfordrede til afskaffelse af kolonialt slaveri, 20. maj . Han delegerede den omstridte Manchester -politiregning, ved hvilken en & £ 20 lokal franchise blev oprettet, til Preston -medlemmet John Wood, der bar den, men håndterede selv forbedringsregningerne i Manchester og Salford.32 Han foreslog mindre ændringer af John Stuart Wortley & rsquos -spilregningen, men indrømmede det var & lsquothe bedste. endnu . om emnet & rsquo, 24., 26., 28. juni. Han delte imod ærkebiskoppen af ​​Canterbury & rsquos registrar bill, 12. juni og de foreslåede Buckingham House -udgifter, 23. juni og stemte for undersøgelse af den irske kirke, den 24. juni. Han lavede sin sene introduktion og regeringen & rsquos nægtede at holde det over sin undskyldning for at modsætte sig det nye kirkeforslag, 30. juni. Han delte imod dem for nedsættelse af ammunition, 4. juli. Efter at have rapporteret den 7. fra komiteen om & lsquolaws vedrørende irske vandrere & rsquo (indrømmet ham, 12. mar. 1828), informerede han Edward:

Han udtrykte også betænkeligheder med hensyn til, at hans lovforslag skulle forudgås af en, der foreslår at indføre de engelske fattige love for Irland.34

Hans soldatsøn Henry & rsquos spilgæld (som Derby gik med til at hjælpe med) og hans stedmor & rsquos dødelig sygdom optog Stanley i 1829.35 Han delte til katolsk frigørelse, 6., 30. marts, og bifaldede dens indrømmelse, da han forelagde gunstige andragender, 9., 16. mar. bemærkninger, han fremsatte den 10. om de midler, hvormed anti-katolske andragender var blevet fremskaffet, især en fra Lonsdale hundred & lsquohawked om fra hus til hus & rsquo og & lsquosent til skiferbrudene for at opnå underskrifter fra minearbejderne og rsquo, fremkaldte skadelige skænderier med dens instigator Thomas Braddyll & dolk fra Conishead Priory og programleder Greene, som Stanley med rette opfattede som forudset et tilbud fra Ultras om at afsætte ham ved det næste valg.36 Han kritiserede den foreslåede opløsning af hans gamle militsregiment, 16. mar., rejste andragender mod & lsquohuckshops & rsquo og til skattelettelser den dag og flere mod at ændre ruten for jernbanen Liverpool-Manchester ay, 23., 27. mar. Sygdom forhindrede ham i at vende tilbage efter påskeferien, og han opgav sin irske og skotske fattige regning for den session.37 I august meddelte Edward i Liverpool, at han havde et amtsæde i tankerne.38 Ved December 1829 Stanley var egnet til en lang dag & rsquos -skydning og skrev vagt til Edward om et familiebesøg med sine døtre og deres familier til Eaton Hall, hvor Grosvenors & rsquo -gæster inkluderede & lsquoSir Foster Cunliffe* og Lady Cunliffe med to markante savner, den yngste den mest forfærdeligt dyr af mandig kvinde, at jeg nogensinde havde haft den ulykke at møde & rsquo.39

Stanley & rsquos mindretal stemmer for at begrænse estimaterne til seks måneder, 19. februar, og enfranchisementen i Birmingham, Leeds og Manchester, 23. februar, dæmpede, men undlod at tavse spekulationerne om, at Derbys (og Grosvenors) ville gå over til regeringen i 1830.40 forretningspres deres undskyldning, boykottede han og Edward Whig-mødet den 3. marts, som inviterede Lord Althorp til at blive Commons-leder.41 At bryde sin tavshed om nød, da han fremlagde et andragende på 13.000 underskrifter fra Manchester, 22. mar., erkendte han sværhedsgraden af ​​den økonomiske nedtur, men bestred andragerne & rsquo -påstande om, at det var forårsaget af ændringer i valuta, militær- og flådeudgifter og høje offentlige lønninger og rsquo, og sagde, at selvom han hilste Wellington & rsquos seneste indrømmelser velkommen, gik de ikke langt nok. Han tilføjede, at han hverken ville stemme for den radikale Whig Edward Davenport & rsquos -tilstandsbevægelse eller Ultra Curteis & rsquos -ændringen heraf, & lsquobecause jeg tror ikke, at deres vedtagelse er beregnet til at fjerne det klagede under, men at de tværtimod vil give stige til fejlagtige indtryk og til ubegrundede håb og forventninger & rsquo. Han delte sig mod flådens skøn den dag og sparsomt med den genoplivede Whig -opposition (for skatterevision, 25. mar., Mod Bathurst- og Dundas -pensionerne, 26. mar., På Terceira, 28. april, assisterende finansminister og rsquos -løn, 10. maj , private byrådsmedlemmer og rsquo -vederlag, 14. maj og Canada, 25. maj). Han støttede de andragender, han fremlagde mod East India Company & rsquos handelsmonopol, 22. februar, 10., 15., 16., 22., 29. marts, 12. maj og støttede Littleton & rsquos lastbilregning, 3. 17. maj. Han delte sig til jødisk frigørelse den dag og stemte for at afskaffe dødsstraf for forfalskning, 7. juni, som han havde parret til, den 24. maj, og indbragte gunstige andragender 22. marts, 26. april, 10., 17. maj. Han støttede andragender mod salg af ølregning, 23., 29. marts, 29. april, 4., 12., 17. maj, kritiserede det som kontraproduktivt, 29. april, 3. maj og stemte for at begrænse dets bestemmelser for on- forbrug, 21. juni. Han betragtede andragender om afholdenhed og søndagsafslutning & lsquolaudable & rsquo i deres generelle mål, men ikke levedygtige, 4. juni. Han roste motiverne for Cheshire, Derbyshire, Lancashire og Yorkshire calico -printere i forsøget på at regulere deres handel ved at begrænse antallet af lærlinge og beskatte maskiner den 24. maj. Han advarede mod at skynde sig gennem & lsquohalf-pay-lærlinge & rsquo-lovforslaget, som parlamentet, 11. juni. Da han introducerede sin irske og skotske vandrageregning, den 11. juni, fremstillede han den som en & lsquogradual & rsquo -foranstaltning, beregnet til at lindre sogne, som vandrerne passerede igennem, den 24. maj og indrømmede den 26., at han ikke havde udsigt til at afholde den den session. Juni erkendte han, at selvom han havde forventet fjendtlighed i London, var han blevet overrasket af Lancashire & rsquos -oppositionen, for det havde aldrig været hans hensigt, som hans modstandere fastholdt, at gøre flytninger obligatoriske. Blackburne & rsquos kommende pensionering og kandidaturet til Ultra John Wilson Patten var blevet annonceret i november 1829, og med andre udfordrere manøvrerede Stanley tæt på amtsforretninger før opløsningen i 1830. Han tog ansvaret for Wigan-Newton, Warrington-Newton, St. Helens-Runcorn Gap og Stockport-krydset jernbaneregninger. Han assisterede også med Sankey Navigation og Liverpool Docks -regningerne og bar forbedringsregninger for Bolton, Manchester og Salford i tænderne på stærk modstand. Han havde til hensigt at gøre plads for Edward i amtet i tilfælde af en konkurrence, men ingen fulgte, så han kom ind med Wilson Patten og forlod Edward for at besejre Hunt at Preston. På hustingsene roste han Wellington for at have indrømmet emancipation, håbede at han ville fremme reformer og erklærede imod afstemningen og East India Company & rsquos monopol.42 Diskuterede valgresultaterne med Henry Brougham* før åbningen af ​​jernbanen Liverpool-Manchester i september 1830, han skrev: & lsquo Jeg frygter, at Wellington ryster, men hvad skal resultatet være, hvis han falder? Jeg ser ingen egnet til at gribe personalet og bruge det ordentligt & rsquo.43

Ministre opførte naturligvis Stanley blandt deres & lsquofoes & rsquo, og han stemte for at bringe dem ned på civile listen, 15. november 1830. Han anslog, at han fremlagde over 120 Lancashire-antislaveri-andragender den måned. Han og Derby korresponderede tæt om novembervalget i Liverpool i 1830, uroligheder i fremstillingsdistrikterne, som regeringen søgte deres råd om, Edward & rsquos udnævnelse til det grå ministerium og rsquos irske sekretær og hans efterfølgende nederlag ved Hunt ved Preston. 44 Edward & rsquos kontor gjorde Stanley til en let mål for kritik af Tory -oppositionen. Han fremlagde andragender og lobbyede imod lastbilsystemet, 11. december og calico -pligterne med Wilson Patten, 8., 9., 28. februar. Til forskel fra ham godkendte han den ulempe ved calicoer, som regeringen foreslog, 28. februar. andragender, men modsatte sig Preston-Manchester jernbaneregningen på vegne af initiativtagerne til den rivaliserende Preston-Wigan-ordning, 9., 25. februar, 18., 21., 24. mar. . Han håndterede Leeds-Liverpool og Leeds-Manchester jernbaneregninger, 25. februar, 18., 28. marts, og rapporterede fra udvalget om lovforslaget om at yde yderligere finansiering til Liverpool-Manchester-jernbanen, 28. mar. 45 Contradicting Hunt, han vidnede om den stigende begrundelse for reform i Lancashire og fordømte stemmesedlen som et kneb for at lsquoopen døren til bedrag og hykleri, hvilket medførte smilende ansigter og knivstikken bag ryggen & rsquo, 26. februar. Han afslog at godkende en anmodning om det i Liverpool andragende han fremlagde den dag og nægtede at kommentere den seneste bestikkelse der eller diskutere andragendes krav om ranchfremstilling af & lsquosubstantial & rsquo husstandere. Han udtrykte fuld tillid til ministerreformforslaget, herunder dets bestemmelser for Lancashire, 9. mar., Fremsatte gunstige andragender, 17., 18., 19., 22. mar. Og delte ved andenbehandlingen, 22. mar. reformatorer & rsquo kritik af dens & lsquogenerous bestemmelse & rsquo for amtet Durham og Lancashire, 25. mar. Han indførte gunstige andragender fra Broughton og Denton og andre steder, 14. april. Ikke i stand til at foregribe eller afbryde Hunt & rsquos tirade mod lovforslaget, 18. april., hævnede han ved at fordømme de radikales adfærd på de seneste massemøder, som Hunt havde taget fat på, og kritiserede ham hårdt for at have tilsidesat Lancashires forretninger i huset, især udvalgte udvalg. Han stemte imod Gascoyne & rsquos ødelæggende ændring, 19. april 1831. Ved det efterfølgende folketingsvalg frarådede han Edward fra at forsøge Preston, støttede sin nevø Patrick Maxwell Stewart* i Lancaster og foreslog en koalition mellem John Evelyn Denison* og William Ewart* i Liverpool. Wilson Patten & rsquos sene beslutning om at stille op forfærdede ham, men han undlod at vende tilbage til den unitære bankmand og reformator Benjamin Heywood som sin kollega for amtet.46 En redaktion i Tory Manchester Herald narret:

Privat betragtede han regningen & rsquos -passagen som vital for at dæmpe uro, men håbede på ændringer i dens detaljer. Han skrev til Lord Holland fra Liverpool den 8. juni og betroede sine betænkeligheder:

Inden han vendte tilbage for at lide og koge processen med at koge i den menneskelige gryde, London og rsquo, deltog han i en calico -printere & rsquo -middag i Manchester med Wilson Patten, 17. juni 1831 og promoverede kandidaten til Lord Sandon* som Denison & rsquos Liverpool -udskiftning.49

Stanley brugte Lancashire -beviser til at imødegå den tidligere kansler i statskassen Goulburn & rsquos hævder, at loven om salg af øl fra 1830 kun havde forårsaget problemer i landbrugsdistrikter, og opfordrede regeringen til at indføre afhjælpende lovgivning, 30. juni 1831. Han delte sig til det genindførte reformlovforslag kl. sin andenbehandling, 6. juli, og generelt for dens detaljer. Imidlertid afgav han egensindige stemmer for den totale frakendelse af Saltash, som ministrene ikke længere pressede på, 26. juli, og tildelte Stoke-on-Trent et andet medlem (som han også talte for), 4. august, og stemte & lsquowout undskyldning & rsquo imod den foreslåede opdeling af amter, 11. august.50 Han modsatte på en dygtig måde Hunt & rsquos påstande om, at Heywood var forpligtet til at støtte almindelig stemmeret, 8. juli, og han stadfæstede engelske medlemmers ret til at kommentere lovforslaget & rsquos -forslag til skotske og irske valgkredse og omvendt, 4 Aug. He countered Wason&rsquos case for the separate enfranchisement of Toxteth Park by presenting another for a third Liverpool seat, which he neither pursued nor forced to a division, 6 Aug. He defended the bill&rsquos provisions for Lancashire, but acknowledged that the county sought additional representation, 10 Aug. He divided for the bill&rsquos passage, 21 Sept., and the second reading of the Scottish bill, 23 Sept. He was absent from the division on Lord Ebrington&rsquos confidence motion, 10 Oct. He voted for the second reading of the revised reform bill, 17 Dec. 1831, against introducing a £10 poor rate franchise, 3 Feb., and for its provisions for Tower Hamlets, 28 Feb., and Gateshead, 5 Mar. 1832. He divided for its third reading, 22 Mar., and the address calling on the king to appoint only ministers who would carry it unimpaired, 10 May. He declined next day to present a hurriedly adopted Manchester petition requesting that supplies be withheld pending its passage.51 According to the Mirror of Parliament, 11 May, he explained (after John Wood introduced the petition) that he considered this action too extreme, although he regretted the bill&rsquos mutilation in the Lords, and regarded its loss as a &lsquonational calamity&rsquo. Appealing for calm and firmness, he added that should a ministry headed by Wellington &lsquobring forward a measure of equal extent and efficiency . I should not be able to place confidence in them, nor do I believe that they would be able to give satisfaction out of doors&rsquo. Other reporters noted that he confirmed that the sentiments of the petition were those &lsquoof the great majority of the people of Lancashire and the northern counties&rsquo.52 He divided for the Irish reform bill at its second reading, 25 May, and against a Conservative amendment to the Scottish measure, 1 June. Justifying an amendment to the boundary bill substituting Newton for Wigan as the election venue for Lancashire South, he pointed out that &lsquoall the railways go through Newton before getting to Wigan&rsquo, 7 June 1832.

He voted in the minority for appointing 11 of its original members to the reconstituted Dublin election committee, 29 July, but divided with government on the election controversy, 23 Aug. 1831, against the Irish union of parishes bill, 19 Aug., on the Russian-Dutch loan, 26 Jan., 12, 16 July (paired), Portugal, 9 Feb., and the navy civil departments bill, 6 Apr. 1832. Bringing up a petition for a new Liverpool writ, 29 Aug. 1831, he criticized Benett&rsquos franchise bill as unfair to Liverpool freemen like himself who had not voted in November 1830 and those subsequently admitted, and warned that &lsquoconjointly with the . reform bill&rsquo it would throw &lsquothe representation into the hands of the winning parties&rsquo. As usual, he brought up petitions on many local bills and issues, including flour imports, combinations and savings banks, 14 July 1831, and the unpopular general register bill, 13 Feb. 1832. His conduct as chairman of the committee on the Manchester-Leeds railway bill was severely criticized on the floor of the House, when a committee of appeal was conceded, 18 July, and again, 28 July 1831. He was also called on to justify his handling of legislation for the Warrington-Newton railway, 4, 9 Aug. He quizzed its instigator Hobhouse, 30 July 1831, and presented petitions in favour of the factory regulation bill, 13 Feb., 13, 14 Mar. 1832. He presented hostile petitions, 9, 10 Apr., and reported from the committee on the Manchester-Bolton-Bury railway bill, 11 May, and brought up petitions for the Birmingham-Leeds scheme, 22 May. He defended his conduct as a member of the committee on the Manchester improvement bill and as grand jury foreman, when they were criticized on 23, 26 Feb., 27 Mar. 1832 by Hunt, who used the October 1831 Preston riots to revive the campaign against the Peterloo magistrates and the grand jury.

Pleading increasing deafness, Stanley announced in July 1832 that he was standing down at the dissolution. Det Manchester Guardian praised his &lsquoconstant accessibility&rsquo and &lsquodevotion of time and talents to his constituents&rsquo.53 As agreed in April 1831, he was raised to the peerage after the general election in December, when Edward came in for Lancashire North and Henry for Preston, where the Whig-Tory coalition was restored.54 He succeeded as 13th earl in October 1834 and became a knight of the garter in 1839, but was denied (1837, 1839) the dukedom he coveted. He recovered from a stroke which cost him &lsquothe use of the left side leg and arm&rsquo, and died at Knowsley following another in June 1851. He was buried alongside his wife in the old family vault at Ormskirk. He was recalled as a president of the Linnaean Society (1828-34) and London Zoological Society (1834-d.) and as the founder at Knowlsey of a museum and private zoo of 1,293 birds and 345 mammals, whose upkeep (£15,000 a year) severely encumbered his estates.55 Although his will was proved under £12,000 in the province of York and £12,000 in Canterbury, 22 Oct. 1851, he was deemed insolvent. Edward, as 14th earl, executed his instructions for the disposal of his collections (by gift to the queen and to London Zoo and by sale), raising £7,000.56


Edward Stanley - History

IN the first part of this book I have given the reader a direct and lineal succession of this most antient house from their original, (as far as I am able to discover it) to the year 1776

And have also taken notice of and described the leading collateral branch, in the person of Sir John Stanley, whose successors became EARLS of DERBY, and have lineally deduced them from him to the demise of Edward, the late Earl above-mentioned.

I have likewise given the pedigree and genealogy of Sir Thomas Latham, Lord of Latham, and the marriage of his only daughter with the aforesaid Sir John Stanley, with their issue in the leading line, to the time before-mentioned together with the history and descendants of his natural son, Sir Oskatel, which hath so far completed the history proposed, and naturally leads me into a new scene of proceeding by a lineal and successive description of every other colletaral branch issuing out of, or from the original stock, some of whom went out full early as the said Sir John but his branch being highly advanced in honour and dignity, claims the first notice and I will, as intended, give the reader a true sight of our proceeding, and prevent all confusion in the coherence of one part with the other.

The first and next branch in due course is, the honourable and worthy house of Greswithen, in the county of Cumberland, whose origin and descendants are described by the following printed table.

'Genealogia et Antiquae Familiae de STANLEY

William de Stanleigh, Lord of Stanleigh in the county of Stafford, Esq

JOAN eldest daughter and one of the heirs of Sir P. Bamville, Knight, Lord of Stourton.

John de Stanleigh, Lord of Stanleigh and Stourton in Wirral, in the county of Chester, Esq. son and heir of William.

WILLIAM of Stanleigh, Lord of Stanleigh and Stourton, who lived in the 26th of Edward III.

-ALICE, daughter of Hugh Massey of Timperley.

WILLIAM of Stanleigh, junior, Lord of Stanleigh and Stourton, he lived in the 10th of Richard II.

-MARGERY, the daughter and heir of William Hooton, Ld. of Hooton.

WILLIAM of Stanleigh Knight, Lord of Stanleigh

-MARGERY, the daughter of John Ardern, Knight.

WIILIAM of Stanleigh, Esq Lord of Stanleigh, he lived in the 10th of Hen. VI.

-MARY, the daughter of Sir John Savage, Knight.

JOHN Stanleigh, the younger son.

-ISABEL, daughter and heir of Sir Thos. Latham, Lord of Latham.

JOHN Stanleigh Knight, Steward of the Household to King Henry IV.

-ELIZABETH, the sister of Sir William Harrington, Knight.

Sir Thomas Stanley, Knt. Comptroller of the Household to King Henry VI. who created him the first Baron Stanley. of this Thomas are the EARLS of DERBY, the Lord Monteagle, and the Stanley's of Lancashire.

John Stanleigh of Greswithen, in the county Cumberland, the younge son

John Stanleigh of Greswithin, son and heir of John, he lived in the 10th of Edward III.

NICHOLAS Stanleigh, Esq. son and heir he had by, his wife, the manor of Awsthwaite, now called Dalegarth.

-CONSTANCE-daughter and heir of Thomas Awsthwaite of Awsthwaite.

Thomas Stanley, Esq. of Awsthwaite, in the county Cumberland, son and heir he lived in the 10th of Henry VI.

John Stanleigh, gentleman, second son of Hall Thwaite, the county of Cumberland.

William Stanley, gentleman, third son. Nicholas Stanley, son and heir of Awsthwaite, he lived in the 38th of Henry VI

Thomas Stanley, of Hall Thwaite.

THOMAS Stanley, of Dalegarth, Esq.

-ANN, Daughter of Sir Richard Huddleston, Knight.

John Stanley, son and heir.

WILLIAM Stanley,-of Dalegarth, Esq.

-ALICE, daughter of Sir R. Ducket, Knt.

William Stanley, son and heir.

THOMAS Stanley of Dalegarth, Esq.

-MARGARET, the daughter of J. Fleming, of Rydal, in the county of Westmoreland, Esq.

Roger Stanley, son and heir.

JOHN Stanley, of Dalegarth, Esq.

-MARGARET, the daughter of Thomas Senhouse, Esq.

THOMAS Stanley of Dalegarth, Esq

-ISABEL, daughter of John Leak, of Edmonton.

EDWARD Stanley eldest son.

-ANNE, one of the two daughters, and coheirs of Thomas Briggs, of Cowmire, in the county of Westmoreland, Esq.

-MERCY, daughter.of Thomas Stanley,, of Lee, in the county of Sussex Esq.

ISABEL, eldest, daughter of T. Curwen, of Setto Park, Esq.

Christopher Stanley, second son.

THOMAS Stanley, youngest son, master of the mint.

THE widow of Sir James Wytford.

Mary Stanley the daughter and sole heir, married to Sir Edwd. Herbert. Knt. second son of William, Earl of Penmbroke.

John Stanley, of Arnaby, in Cumberland, gentleman

Christopher Stanley, eldest, son of John Stanley, of Arnaby.

Thomas Stanley, of Lee, in Sussex.

-DOROTHY, daughter of Edward Holt, of Wigan, in Lancashire, Gentleman.

Thomas Stanley died with issue.

Edward Stanley died young.

William Stanley died young.

Isabel Stanley, married to W. Copley, of Gosforth Hall, in Cumberland, Gent.

Barbara Stanley died un-married.

Dorothy Stanley, married to Robert Maudesfley, of Maudesley, in Lancashire, Esq.

John Stanley died without issue.

Marmaduke Stanley died without issue.

-MILDRED, daughter of the Right Rev. Sir George Fleming, Bart. Lord Bishop of Carlisle.

John Stanley, Rector of Workington, married Clara, the daughter of Philipson, of Callgerth, in Westmoreland, Gentleman.

Thomas Stanley died un-married,

William Stanley died young.

Holt Stanley, Lt. in Brigadier Gen. Wentworth's regiment of foot, unmarried.

Dorothy Stanley, married Huddleston Park, of Whitbeck, in Cumberland, Gent.

Isabel Stanley, married John Kilpatrick, of Whitehaven, in Cumberland, Gent.

Loveday Stanley, unmarried.

Elizabeth Stanley, married Richard Cook, of Camerton, in Cumberland, Esq.

I have to observe farther of Thomas Stanley, Master of the Mint, that Sir Edward Herbert, younger son to William Herbert, Earl of Pembroke, married Mary, the daughter and sole heir of Thomas Stanley of Standon in the county of Hertford, Esq. in the year 1570, youngest son of Thomas Stanley, of Dalegarth, in the county of Cumberland,


Indhold

Stanley was born in Marylebone, London, the eldest son and heir apparent of Edward Stanley, later to become 17th Earl of Derby, by Lady Alice Montagu. He was spectacularly well-connected to leading political families.

His father was at the time of Stanley's birth Conservative MP for Westhoughton, Lancashire, and went on to serve as Secretary of State for War from 1916 to 1918 and from 1922 to 1924. His paternal grandfather, the 16th Earl of Derby, was a former Lancashire MP, Colonial Secretary, and Governor-General of Canada. His great-uncle, the 15th Earl, twice served as Foreign Secretary and was Prime Minister Lord Salisbury's stepfather, while his best-known ancestor was his great-grandfather, the 14th Earl, who was Leader of the Conservative Party for 22 years (1846–1868 the longest tenure in that office) and Prime Minister three times (1852, 1858–59, and 1866–68). His paternal grandmother, Lady Constance Villiers, was daughter of Lord Clarendon, who himself served on three occasions as Foreign Secretary. Lord Stanley's paternal uncles Sir Arthur and Sir George also served as Conservative MPs.

His maternal grandfather was William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, also a Conservative peer and MP. His maternal grandmother Louisa von Alten married after the death of the Duke of Manchester, Spencer, Duke of Devonshire, also known as Lord Hartington, who for a time (before inheriting his peerage) was Leader of the Liberal Party in the House of Commons.

His sister Victoria married Neil Primrose, the son of Liberal Prime Minister Lord Rosebery. Oliver Stanley was his younger brother, and his son Richard became an MP.

He became known by the courtesy title Lord Stanley in 1908, when his father succeeded in the earldom of Derby. He was educated at Eton and Magdalen College, Oxford. [1]

Lord Stanley was commissioned a second lieutenant on 2 July 1914. [2] He was promoted to temporary lieutenant in the Grenadier Guards on 15 November 1914, [3] later with seniority from 3 November 1914, [4] and became a substantive lieutenant on 11 November 1914. [5]

On 29 January 1916, he was made a supernumerary temporary captain with the Guards, [6] relinquishing the rank on 12 May 1916. [7] Lord Stanley was appointed adjutant of the newly formed Household Battalion on 9 September 1916, again as a temporary captain. [8] He received a substantive captaincy on 26 September 1916 [9] and served as adjutant until 12 January 1917. [10]

He was appointed a staff captain and seconded on 13 August 1917, [11] and made a brigade major on 22 January 1918, [12] a post he held until 11 March 1918. [13] He served as a general staff officer, 3rd grade, from 6 May 1918 [14] to 8 October 1918. On 9 October 1918, he was again appointed a brigade major, [15] serving in that capacity until 2 November 1919. Lord Stanley was awarded the Military Cross on 3 June 1919, for his service in Italy during the First World War. [16] On 27 November 1920, he retired from the Army and entered the reserve of officers as a captain. [17]

Lord Stanley was first elected to Parliament on 28 June 1917 in a by-election in Liverpool Abercromby. He left Parliament the following year, when the seat was abolished for the 1918 general election. [1] [18] During this time, he was the Baby of the House. He returned to Parliament in the 1922 general election when he was elected for Fylde. [1] [19] He served under Stanley Baldwin as a Junior Lord of the Treasury from 1924 to 1927 and was a Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party from 1927 to 1929. [1]

On the formation of the National Government after the 1931, Stanley was made Parliamentary and Financial Secretary to the Admiralty under Ramsay MacDonald. [1] On 26 February 1934, he was admitted to the Privy Council. [20] In 1935 he was made Under-Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs by Baldwin, and later that year was made Parliamentary and Financial Secretary to the Admiralty. Two years later, Lord Stanley became Under-Secretary of State for India and Burma. [1] On 16 May 1938 he entered the cabinet as Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs. [21] His brother, Oliver, was also in the Cabinet as President of the Board of Trade. However, in October 1938, five months after being appointed to the cabinet, Lord Stanley died in Marylebone, aged 44. [1] Neville Chamberlain paid tribute to him in the House of Commons: "So great, indeed, was his keenness and his interest in Imperial relations that he insisted on carrying out his intention to visit Canada, although even then he was suffering from the disease which has now ended fatally. Perhaps in that office he would have, for the first time, found an opportunity of showing the full extent of his powers, for those who knew him best had long recognised that he possessed to an exceptional degree the high qualities of steady judgment and sterling good sense, combined with a complete and utter selflessness and integrity of purpose." [22]

Lord Stanley married the Honourable Sibyl Louise Beatrix Cadogan, daughter of Henry Cadogan, Viscount Chelsea, in 1917 they had three sons. He died in Marylebone, London, in October 1938, aged 44, predeceasing his father by ten years. His eldest son Edward succeeded his grandfather in the earldom in 1948. Another son, Richard, later became MP for Fylde North. Lady Stanley died in June 1969, aged 76. [1]


Edward Stanley Wiki, Biography, Net Worth, Age, Family, Facts and More

You will find all the basic Information about Edward Stanley. Rul ned for at få de komplette detaljer. We walk you through all about Edward. Checkout Edward Wiki Alder, biografi, karriere, højde, vægt, familie. Bliv opdateret med os om dine foretrukne berømtheder. Vi opdaterer vores data fra tid til anden.

BIOGRAFI

Edward Stanley is a well known Celebrity. Edward was born on June 29, 1852 in British..Edward is one of the famous and trending celeb who is popular for being a Celebrity. As of 2018 Edward Stanley is 43 years (age at death) years old. Edward Stanley is a member of famous Celebrity liste.

Wikifamouspeople has ranked Edward Stanley as of the popular celebs list. Edward Stanley is also listed along with people born on June 29, 1852. One of the precious celeb listed in Celebrity list.

Nothing much is known about Edward Education Background & Childhood. Vi opdaterer dig snart.

detaljer
Navn Edward Stanley
Alder (fra 2018) 43 years (age at death)
Erhverv Celebrity
Fødselsdato June 29, 1852
Fødested Ikke kendt
Nationalitet Ikke kendt

Edward Stanley Net Worth

Edward primary income source is Celebrity. I øjeblikket har vi ikke nok oplysninger om hans familie, forhold, barndom osv. Vi opdaterer snart.

Anslået nettoværdi i 2019: $ 100K- $ 1 mio. (Ca.)

Edward Age, Height & Weight

Edward body measurements, Height and Weight are not Known yet but we will update soon.

Familie & amp relationer

Not Much is known about Edward family and Relationships. Alle oplysninger om hans privatliv er skjult. Vi opdaterer dig snart.

Fakta

  • Edward Stanley age is 43 years (age at death). fra 2018
  • Edward birthday is on June 29, 1852.
  • Zodiac sign: Cancer.

-------- Tak skal du have --------

Influencer mulighed

Hvis du er en Model, Tiktoker, Instagram Influencer, Fashion Blogger eller enhver anden Social Media Influencer, der ønsker at få fantastiske samarbejder. Så kan du slutte sig til vores Facebook -gruppe som hedder "Influencer påvirker mærker". Det er en platform, hvor påvirkere kan mødes, samarbejde, få muligheder for samarbejde fra mærker og diskutere fælles interesser.

Vi forbinder mærker med sociale medietalenter for at skabe kvalitetssponsoreret indhold


STANLEY, Edward John (1802-1869), of 38 Lower Brook Street, Mdx.

b. 13 Nov. 1802, 1st s. of Sir John Thomas Stanley†, 7th bt., of Alderley Park, Cheshire and Penrhos, Anglesey and Hon. Maria Josepha Holroyd, da. of John Baker Holroyd†, 1st earl of Sheffield [I]. educ. Eton 1816 Christ Church, Oxf. 1822. m. 7 Oct. 1826, at Florence (and again, 26 June 1833, at Alderley), Hon. Henrietta Maria Dillon Lee, da. of Henry Augustus Dillon Lee†, 13th Visct. Dillon [I], 4s. 8da. (3 d.v.p.). cr. Bar. Eddisbury 12 May 1848 suc. fa. as 2nd Bar. Stanley of Alderley 23 Oct. 1850. d. 16 June 1869.

Offices Held

Under-sec. of state for home affairs July-Nov. 1834 sec. to treasury Apr. 1835-June 1841 paymaster-gen. July-Sept. 1841, Feb. 1852, Jan. 1853-Mar. 1855 PC 11 Aug. 1841 under-sec. of state for foreign affairs July 1846-Dec. 1851 vice-pres. bd. of trade Feb. 1852, Jan. 1853-Mar. 1855, pres. Mar. 1855-Feb. 1858 postmaster-gen. Aug. 1860-July 1866.

Biografi

‘Ben’ Stanley was how this Member was familiarly known, after his Oxford nickname ‘Sir Benjamin Backbite’, a character in Sheridan’s School for Scandal, which he earned for his cutting satirical powers.1 It also usefully distinguished him from his contemporary and distant relation Edward Smith Stanley*, who later sat in the Lords as Lord Stanley of Bickerstaffe and 14th earl of Derby.2 Another Edward Stanley, Edward John’s uncle, was bishop of Norwich, and had a son, Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, who became dean of Westminster. John Thomas Stanley, who was a Pittite Member for Wootton Bassett in the 1790 Parliament, retired from politics in 1796, but was wooed by the Whigs, and, having succeeded to his father’s baronetcy in 1807, he became one of their leading supporters in Cheshire, where he had his principal estates.3 From at least 1813 Edward John, the elder of his twin sons, was educated at ‘Egglesfield House’, probably a school in Eaglesfield, near Cockermouth, from where he recounted his early visits to the Lakes.4 In 1816 his maternal grandfather, now earl of Sheffield, who thought him ‘a stout, square, squat little fellow, just like his grandpapa’, related an incident in which he was believed to have been drowned in the Thames at Eton, but had actually just abandoned his clothes on the riverbank, and gone to dine in a borrowed outfit. By 1820 Sheffield had decided that Stanley should have a career in diplomacy, ‘in which his talents will not be thrown away, in which he may pass his time most agreeably, and fit himself for the first offices in the state’.5

Stanley’s tutor, the Rev. Charles Girdlestone, described him as ‘giddy’ on his first introduction to university life, and as not overly attentive to his studies. His coming of age was celebrated on his father’s Anglesey estate in 1823, and the following year he may have spoken at a dinner on the construction of the Menai Straits Bridge and served on the Anglesey grand jury.6 Later in 1824 he badly damaged, and may even have lost part of, a finger during a shooting accident at Kedleston Hall, Derbyshire.7 Having taken his degree in 1825, he travelled via Brussels, Frankfurt and Geneva to Florence. From there he wrote to his mother, 15 Dec. 1825, that ‘I feel it perfectly impossible to live the life of a quiet country gentleman for from my present views and intimacies I could not bear the rough vulgarity of honest goodfellows’ and he explained his intention of residing in Italy for at least three years, perhaps as an attaché, in order to prepare for his career.8 It was there, in the autumn of the following year, that he married a young woman of pronounced radical opinions, the daughter of the flamboyant but penurious Irish peer Lord Dillon, who was one of the leaders of Florence’s émigré circle. He was elected to Brooks’s, 24 Feb. 1828, sponsored by Lords Normanby* and Duncannon*. He attended the Cheshire Whig Club dinner in October that year, and the county meeting on reform, 17 Mar. 1831, at which his father took a prominent part.9 It was possibly at about this time that he became, for a short period, private secretary to Lord Durham, the lord privy seal.10 At the general election that year his father’s Whig neighbour and political associate Lord Grosvenor put him up for his vacant seat at Hindon, and he was elected in second place, ahead of an anti-reformer.11 At a meeting in Macclesfield, 4 May, he advocated moderate reform, and ‘speaking of boroughmongers, said that they were in distress and hung out a sham banner of reform, with which they hoped to mislead and delude the people’. He seconded the nomination of the reformer George Wilbraham* at the Cheshire election, 13 May 1831.12

Stanley voted for the second reading of the Grey ministry’s reintroduced reform bill, 6 July, at least once against adjourning proceedings on it, 12 July 1831, and thereafter with great regularity for its details. He made his maiden speech (as ‘Mr. John Stanley’), 28 July, when, supporting the partial disfranchisement of Dorchester, he pointed out that the schedule B boroughs had been so chosen because they were too small to deserve two seats and that ‘if I were of opinion that they were all mere nomination boroughs, I should come forward at once and move that they be transferred to schedule A’. He spoke against enfranchising Stoke, 4 Aug., arguing that, compared to a more populous county like Lancashire, Staffordshire was already sufficiently represented. He moved an amendment to, and made a suggestion on, the game bill, 8 Aug., and intervened in defence of Thomas Duncombe, 9 Aug. He opposed the idea of giving Merthyr Tydfil a separate seat, since Glamorgan was proportionately well represented, 10 Aug., and that day he defended ministers’ treatment of Wales in the reform bill. He may have voted for, or abstained on, Lord Chandos’s amendment, 18 Aug., because, as he later told the Cheshire electors:

He sided with ministers on the Dublin election controversy, 23 Aug. He voted for the third reading of the reform bill, 19 Sept., its passage, 21 Sept., the second reading of the Scottish bill, 23 Sept., and Lord Ebrington’s confidence motion, 10 Oct. At the Cheshire county meeting, 25 Oct. 1831, he moved the address to the king, and, in a long reform speech, he opposed the tactic of withholding supplies, but insisted that there was no popular reaction against the bill and that delaying concessions to public opinion would be dangerous.14

He voted for the second reading of the revised bill, 17 Dec. 1831, the disfranchisement clauses, 20, 23 Jan. 1832, and again for its details. He praised the division of counties as a means of reducing costs, 27 Jan., on the grounds that ‘the expenses of elections . deters many independent men of moderate fortunes from engaging in a contest’, and, making specific reference to Cheshire, that ‘the arrangement will tend to increase the influence of the landed [over the manufacturing] interest’. He was added to the select committee on the East India Company’s affairs, 1 Feb. He voted with government against the production of information on Portugal, 9 Feb. He moved for accounts of the silk trade, 16 Feb., and on 1 Mar. he pointed out that distress in this industry extended beyond Manchester to Congleton and Macclesfield. He opposed uniting Gateshead with Durham and transferring its intended seat to Merthyr, 5 Mar. He told the House that the two principal arguments against reform, its inexpediency and unpopularity, had been overturned, 22 Mar., when he gave a lengthy recital of the Whig arguments in favour of restoring the constitution to its original purity. He ridiculed opposition for its pettiness in pointing out minor inconsistencies and declared that the solution to the prevailing evils was ‘to destroy irresponsible power, which is tyranny, and to make it responsible, which is good government’, and ‘to restore sympathy between the governors and the governed’. He also denied the allegation of the Cheshire anti-reform petition that public opinion had turned against the bill, and of course divided with ministers in favour of the third reading that day. He voted against the recommittal of the Irish registry of deeds bill, 9 Apr. He voted in favour of Ebrington’s motion for an address calling on the king to appoint only ministers who would carry the reform bill unimpaired, 10 May, and the third reading of the Irish bill, 25 May. He paired against increasing the county representation of Scotland, 1 June. His only other known votes in this Parliament were with ministers for the Russian-Dutch loan, 26 Jan., 12 and (pairing) 16 July 1832.

His seat at Hindon was abolished by the Reform Act, but having spoken in praise of reform, against pledges and reluctantly in favour of the ballot, he was elected as a Liberal for Cheshire North at the general election in December 1832.15 He continued to represent his county, except during the 1841 Parliament, while his twin, William Owen Stanley, entered the House as Liberal Member for Anglesey in 1837, and subsequently sat for Chester and Beaumaris District. Stanley acted as Whig whip during Lord Melbourne’s second ministry and was one of the founders of the Reform Club in 1836. He was given a peerage in 1848, and in 1850 he succeeded his father, who had been created Baron Stanley of Alderley in 1839. He held several ministerial offices and, as postmaster-general, sat in Lord Palmerston and Lord John Russell’s cabinets. In 1834 the duchesse de Dino described him as ‘une espèce de faux dandy parfaitement radical et de la plus mauvaise et vulgaire sorte’ and although Lord Malmesbury thought him ‘a very amusing man, and clever’, he was known to be a ‘rough diamond’.16 The family biographer Nancy Mitford wrote that ‘he was a very disagreeable man indeed. I have heard it said, and I hope it is true, that on his death bed he apologized to his wife and children for his great nastiness to them at all times’.17 He died in June 1869, in noticing which even Tiderne was drawn to comment that he was ‘a man of ready and somewhat incisive wit’, which ‘has been accused of having in it the spice of ill-nature’. He was survived by his charming and intelligent wife, who was a fervent Liberal and one of the earliest champions of women’s education. The bulk of his estate passed in trust to his eldest son, Henry Edward John (1827-1903), an eccentric diplomat and Muslim, who succeeded him as 3rd Baron Stanley.18 His second son, John Constantine (1837-78), was colonel of the Coldstream Guards, and his fourth, Algernon Charles (1843-1928), was bishop of Emmaus, while his third, Edward Lyulph (1839-1925), who was Liberal Member for Oldham, 1880-5, succeeded as 4th Baron Stanley in 1903 and as 4th earl of Sheffield in 1909.


Edward Stanley Net Worth

Edward Stanley estimated Net Worth, Salary, Income, Cars, Lifestyles & many more details have been updated below. Let’s check, How Rich is Edward Stanley in 2019-2020?

According to Wikipedia, Forbes, IMDb & Various Online resources, famous Celebrity Edward Stanley’s net worth is $1-5 Million before died. Edward Stanley earned the money being a professional Celebrity. Edward Stanley is from Britisk.

Edward Stanley’s Net Worth:
$1-5 Million

Estimated Net Worth in 2020Under Review
Previous Year’s Net Worth (2019)Under Review
Annual Salary Under Review.
Income SourcePrimary Income source Celebrity (profession).
Net Worth Verification StatusNot Verified


A Familiar History of Birds of the World

Edward Stanley FRS (1 January 1779 – 6 September 1849) was an English clergyman who served as Bishop of Norwich between 1837 and 1849. He set about combating laxity and want of discipline among the clergy.

Born in London into a notable Cheshire family, Stanley was the second son of Sir John Stanley, 6th Baronet, and the younger brother of John Stanley, 1st Baron Stanley of Alderley.

Educated at St J Edward Stanley FRS (1 January 1779 – 6 September 1849) was an English clergyman who served as Bishop of Norwich between 1837 and 1849. He set about combating laxity and want of discipline among the clergy.

Born in London into a notable Cheshire family, Stanley was the second son of Sir John Stanley, 6th Baronet, and the younger brother of John Stanley, 1st Baron Stanley of Alderley.

Educated at St John's College, Cambridge (16th wrangler, 1802), he was ordained in 1802 and three years later became rector of Alderley, Cheshire, a position he held for the next 32 years.[1] While there he took a great interest in education, and encouraged especially the teaching of secular subjects at his school.

Edward Stanley died in 1849 and was buried in the nave of Norwich cathedral. He had married Catherine, eldest daughter of Oswald Leycester (another notable Cheshire family) in 1810. They had five children, including Owen Stanley, Arthur Penrhyn Stanley and Mary Stanley.

He was succeeded by Samuel Hinds, an Anglo-Catholic with strong associations with the Maoris of New Zealand, notably the Ngati Kuri and Te Patu tribes. . mere


Past Prime Ministers

29 March 1799, Knowsley Hall, Prescot, Lancashire

23 October 1869, Knowsley Hall, Prescot, Lancashire

Dates in office

1866 to 1868, 1858 to 1859, 1852 to 1852

Political party

Major acts

India Bill 1858: transferring control of the East India Company to the Crown.

Jews Relief Act 1858: ending the disablement for Jews to sit in Parliament.

“My Lords, I am now an old man, and like many of your lordships, I have already passed the 3 score years and 10. My official life is entirely closed my political life is nearly so and, in the course of nature, my natural life cannot now be long.”

The 14th Earl of Derby, Lord Derby, started his career as a Whig. He resigned from Lord Melbourne’s government in 1834 in opposition to plans to reform the Irish Church and later joined the Tory party. Lord Derby presided over the introduction of the Second Reform Act in 1867, which significantly increased the size of the urban electorate.