KGB og Martin Luther King

KGB og Martin Luther King

Torsdag, 2. oktober, 2014

I 1992 forsynede Vasili Mitrokhin, en pensioneret senior KGB-arkivar, Secret Secret Service Service (MI6) med seks store sager med tophemmeligt materiale fra KGB's udenlandske efterretningsarkiv. Noget af dette materiale omhandler mordet på John F. Kennedy. Dette omfatter påstanden fra polske kilder om, at Clinton Murchison og H. L. Hunt havde været involveret i finansieringen af ​​attentatet.

KGB-arkiverne viser, at Sovjetunionen var med til at finansiere udgivelsen af ​​bøgerne med påstand om, at Kennedy blev dræbt som følge af en højrekonspiration. Nogle af disse penge blev sendt til Carl Marzani (kodenavnet NORD). Blandt de bøger udgivet af Marzani i 1964 var Oswald: Assassin or Fall Guy? af den tyske forfatter, Joachim Joesten. KGB sørgede også for, at Mark Lane modtog $ 1.500 for at hjælpe hans forskning. Dokumentet gør det imidlertid klart, at Lane ikke fik at vide kilden til pengene. Den samme person sørgede for, at Lane modtog $ 500 for at hjælpe med at betale for en rejse i Europa i 1964. KGB -agent, Genrikh Borovik, fik også til opgave at hjælpe Lane med sin forskning for Skynd dig til dom (1965).

Sandsynligvis det mest interessante materiale fra dette arkiv vedrører KGB -vurderingen af ​​forholdet mellem John F. Kennedy og Martin Luther King. Lige siden Sovjet begyndte at sende agenter til USA havde de opmuntret medlemmer af Det Kommunistiske Parti i USA (CPUSA) til at blive involveret i kampen for borgerrettigheder. For eksempel nød de stor succes i deres propagandakampagne for Scottsboro Boys i 1931.

Efter Anden Verdenskrig brugte Sovjet den måde, afroamerikanere blev behandlet i USA på som et forsøg på at få indflydelse i den tredje verden. Først hilste de Martin Luther Kings kampagner imod Jim Crow -lovene velkomne, da det gav bevis for den verdensomspændende kamp mod amerikansk imperialisme. Dog til KGB's forfærdelse. King knyttede gang på gang borgerrettighedsbevægelsens mål til opfyldelsen af ​​den amerikanske drøm og "forfatningens storslåede ord og uafhængighedserklæringen".

Efter Kings inspirationsbrev fra Birmingham Fængsel den 16. april 1963, hvor han argumenterede "Vi vil nå målet om frihed i Birmingham og over hele nationen, fordi målet for Amerika er frihed", blev det besluttet af KGB at montere en smørekampagne mod lederen af ​​borgerrettighedsbevægelsen. Opgaven blev givet til Yuri Modin, vicechef for Service A (KGB's desinformationsenhed). Modin er en interessant karakter, der stort set er blevet ignoreret af historikere. Modin var manden, som han i 1947 blev sendt til London og blev hovedkontakt for Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess, Anthony Blunt og John Cairncross. Modin arrangerede også Maclean og Burgess flyvning i 1951 og var i Beirut, da Philby forsvandt i januar 1963.

En af de store ironier i historien er, at mens KGB forsøgte at fremstille King som forræder afroamerikanere, fortalte J. Edgar Hoover William C. Sullivan, chefen for FBI's efterretningsafdeling, at "King var et instrument af kommunistpartiet ”og udgjorde” en alvorlig trussel mod landets sikkerhed ”. Hoover instruerede Sullivan om at få bevis for, at "King havde et forhold til sovjetblokken". På trods af en intensiv overvågningskampagne kunne Sullivan ikke finde en klar forbindelse mellem King og det kommunistiske parti i USA. Dette forhindrede ikke Hoover i at bruge sine kontakter i pressen til at skrive historier, der gav indtryk af, at King var kommunist.

KGB -kampagnen mod King blev forstærket med vedtagelsen af ​​borgerrettighedslovgivningen under præsident Lyndon B. Johnson. Modin sørgede for, at artikler kunne vises i den afrikanske presse, som kunne blive genoptrykt i amerikanske aviser og fremstillede King som en "onkel Tom", der i hemmelighed modtog statstilskud for at tæmme borgerrettighedsbevægelsen og forhindre, at den truede Johnson -administrationen.

Et af de mest interessante dokumenter i KGB -arkivet er dateret august 1967 og bemyndiger Modin: "At organisere, ved brug af KGB -opholdsressourcer i USA, udgivelse og distribution af brochurer, pjecer, foldere og appeller, der fordømmer politikken for Johnson -administrationen om neger -spørgsmålet - og afsløring af de brutale terrormetoder, der bruges af regeringen til at undertrykke negerettighedsbevægelsen. At arrangere, via tilgængelige agentressourcer, at ledende skikkelser i advokatbranchen kommer med offentlige erklæringer, der diskrediterer Johnson's politik administration om neger -spørgsmålet. At smede og distribuere via ulovlige kanaler et dokument, der viser, at John Birch Society i samarbejde med Minuteman -organisationen er ved at udvikle en plan for fysisk eliminering af ledende skikkelser i negerbevægelsen i USA. "

KGB og Martin Luther King (2. oktober 2014)

Tomás Harris død (24. september 2014)

Simuleringer i klasseværelset (1. september 2014)

KGB og JFK -attentatet (21. august 2014)

West Ham United og første verdenskrig (4. august 2014)

Første verdenskrig og krigspropaganda -bureau (28. juli 2014)

Fortolkninger i historie (8. juli 2014)

Alger Hiss blev ikke indrammet af FBI (17. juni 2014)

Google, Bing og Operation Mockingbird: Del 2 (14. juni 2014)

Google, Bing og Operation Mockingbird: CIA og søgemaskineresultater (10. juni 2014)

Eleven som lærer (7. juni 2014)

Er Wikipedia under kontrol af politiske ekstremister? (23. maj, 2014)

Hvorfor MI5 ikke ville have dig til at vide om Ernest Holloway Oldham (6. maj 2014)

Lev Sedovs mærkelige død (16. april 2014)

Hvorfor vi aldrig vil opdage, hvem der dræbte John F. Kennedy (27. marts, 2014)

KGB planlagde at gifte Michael Straight for at blive præsident i USA (20. marts 2014)

Den allieredes plan om at dræbe Lenin (7. marts, 2014)

Blev Rasputin myrdet af MI6? (24. februar 2014)

Winston Churchill og kemiske våben (11. februar 2014)

Pete Seeger og medierne (1. februar 2014)

Skal historielærere bruge Blackadder i klasseværelset? (15. januar 2014)

Hvorfor myrdede efterretningstjenester Dr. Stephen Ward? (8. januar 2014)

Solomon Northup og 12 Years a Slave (4. januar 2014)

Englen i Auschwitz (6. december 2013)

John F. Kennedys død (23. november 2013)

Adolf Hitler og kvinder (22. november 2013)

Nyt bevis i Geli Raubal -sagen (10. november 2013)

Mordssager i klasseværelset (6. november 2013)

Major Truman Smith og finansieringen af ​​Adolf Hitler (4. november 2013)

Unity Mitford og Adolf Hitler (30. oktober 2013)

Claud Cockburn og hans kamp mod Appeasement (26. oktober 2013)

Den mærkelige sag om William Wiseman (21. oktober 2013)

Robert Vansittarts Spy Network (17. oktober 2013)

British Newspaper Reporting of Appeasement og Nazi -Tyskland (14. oktober 2013)

Paul Dacre, The Daily Mail and Fascism (12. oktober 2013)

Wallis Simpson og Nazityskland (11. oktober 2013)

Aktiviteterne i MI5 (9. oktober 2013)

The Right Club og Anden Verdenskrig (6. oktober 2013)

Hvad gjorde Paul Dacres far i krigen? (4. oktober 2013)

Ralph Miliband og Lord Rothermere (2. oktober 2013)


Hvorfor JFK skulle aflytte Martin Luther King

David Garrow, der skrev en Pulitzer-prisvindende biografi om pastor Martin Luther King Jr., har formået at se på hundredvis af aldrig før sete FBI-rapporter og overvågningsresuméer, der afslører de fantastiske fund fra FBI ’s hemmelige overvågning af den legendariske borgerrettighedsleder. Mr. Garrow, en omhyggelig forsker, koncentrerer sig om friske materialer, der afslører kongelige serielle udenforægteskabelige anliggender, men uddyber også en tidligere regeringsskandale: at disse FBI-dokumenter endegyldigt afslører, hvordan dets direktør, J. Edgar Hoover, “autorized top Bureau embedsmænd til at sende Dr. King en båndoptagelse af hans seksuelle aktiviteter sammen med en anonym besked, der opfordrer ham til at tage sit eget liv. ”

En smertefuld historisk beregning af kongens personlige adfærd (adskilt fra hans borgerrettighedspræstationer) og#8220 virker uundgåelig, og han skriver, men Hoovers offentlige adfærd fremstår lige så berygtet. Da statsadvokat Robert Kennedy godkendte aflytningen, argumenterer hr. Garrow for, at han satte gang i en af ​​de mest skamfulde handlinger i moderne amerikansk historie, med henvisning til bånd og brev sendt til King. Venstre og højre er enige om, at dette var en ond handling, der aldrig skulle have fundet sted.

Men var det Kennedys og FBI, der tog fejl ved at trykke på King og hans medarbejderes telefoner og bugsere deres hjem og kontorer, som selv nogle solide konservative synes at sige? (Blandt dem: Mark Levin i sin fremragende nye bog, “Unfrihed i pressen. ”) At trykke på King var den oprindelige synd, foreslår kritikerne, men årsagen til overvågningen var fuldstændig forsvarlig fra et nationalt sikkerhedspunkt udsigt. Vi var trods alt midt i den kolde krig, og King omgav sig med Kreml -loyalister.

FBI begyndte at aflytte King ’s hjem og hans Southern Christian Leadership Conference -kontor i Atlanta den 8. november 1963 med skriftlig godkendelse fra Robert Kennedy og#8217s. En vigtig årsag, som hr. Garrow oplyser os om, er, at FBI insisterende havde fortalt Kennedy, at King ’s nærmeste og mest indflydelsesrige rådgiver ” var advokat og forretningsmand i Stanley D. Levison i New York, “a ‘secret member & #8216 “ fra kommunistpartiet. Tog FBI fejl?

Afdøde John Barron, som forfatteren ofte konsulterede om russisk undergravning, blev betragtet som en fremtrædende myndighed om sovjetisk efterretningstjeneste, efter at have vidnet som ekspertvidne i syv store sovjetiske spionforsøg. Han skrev en ekstraordinært oplysende biografi, “Operation Solo, ” om Morris og Jack Childs, to centrale kommunistparti USA-medlemmer, der forsynede den amerikanske regering med Moskvas indre hemmeligheder i næsten tre årtier.

Brug af oplysninger, som Childs -brødrene leverede, samt omfattende FBI -materialer, her er, hvad Barron skriver om Levison. I 1946 havde han opnået optagelse “ i den kommunistiske undergrunds inderkreds. ” Levison hjalp med at etablere partiforretningsfronter og indsamlede penge fra fest “angels ” i Hollywood og på Wall Street. Både han og hans tvillingebror, Roy, blev betragtet som så loyale CP -medlemmer, at de i 1950'erne blev sat til at styre partiets økonomi.

Levison mødte King i 1950'erne, og, siger Barron, og tilknyttede sig derefter til den unge borgerrettighedsleder som en personlig fortrolig og rådgiver. medlem af partiets styrelsesorgan, Nationalkomiteen. ”

Jack rapporterede, at O ​​’Dell arbejdede på fuld tid ” for King i maj 1960, ligesom Levison -brødrene, og at den nuværende CP -politik “ er at koncentrere sig om Martin Luther King. ”

King var ikke selv kommunist, men hans forbindelse til Levison og O ’Dell lød alarmklokker inden for FBI, der informerede den nyvalgte præsident John Kennedy om hans tætte bånd til disse mangeårige partimedlemmer.

Selvom Levison siges at have tvivl om partiet i midten af ​​1950'erne, bemærker Barron, at han aldrig har handlet som en desillusioneret kommunist. Han fortsatte med at nyde kammeratskabet og samarbejdet mellem flere partifunktionærer længe efter hans påståede desillusion. Mellem 1958 og begyndelsen af ​​1962 chippede Levison-brødrene også regelmæssigt overdådige beløb til festen (vurderet af Mr. Garrow som tæt på trekvart million dollars).

Flere fordømmende oplysninger skulle dukke op. Barron bemærkede, at et FBI -overvågningsteam opdagede, at Levison i 1961 gentagne gange var på besøg … KGB -officer Victor Lessiovsky ”, da Lessiovsky var i FN.

På trods af presserende anmodninger fra præsidenten og hans bror om at droppe Levison og O ’Dell, beholdt King dem som tætte rådgivere, selv under forberedelsen af ​​hans historiske marts i Washington. Selvom han tilsyneladende afbrød forholdet på et tidspunkt, afslører Barron, at han forsigtigt sørgede for at vedligeholde dem begge hemmeligt gennem en mellemmand og til sidst fornyede dem åbent. ” Alt dette verificeres af Mr. 8217s nære ven “ fra slutningen af ​​1950'erne til King ’s død i 1968. ”

Da FBI aflyttede King og hans medarbejdere, drev Nikita Khruschev Kreml og havde stadig til hensigt at erobre Amerika og Vesten. Han skabte alverdens ondsindet ulykke verden over, herunder næsten at provokere en atomkrig ved at placere sovjetiske missiler i Cuba. Kommunistpartiet var stadig Moskvas talerør. Kennedys og FBI ville sikkert have været forladte i deres pligter, hvis de ikke havde godkendt aflytningerne for at se, hvor tæt kommunistiske medlemmer manipulerede King ’s magtfulde massebevægelse. FBI fortjente fordømmelse for at have sendt optagelsen og brevet til King, men potentielt misbrug af data kan ikke opveje behovet for at træffe rimelige foranstaltninger for at sikre nationens sikkerhed. Aflytningskongen var den rigtige ting at gøre.

• Allan H. Ryskind var mangeårig redaktør og ejer af Human Events. Hans seneste bog er “Hollywood Traitors ” (Regnery, 2015).


KGB og Martin Luther King - Historie

Martin Luther Kings Kommunist Forbindelser

“Men der var også falske profeter blandt folket, ligesom der vil være falske lærere blandt jer, som privat vil bringe fordømmelige kætterier ind og endda fornægte Herren, der købte dem, og bringe sig selv en hurtig ødelæggelse.” 2. Peter 2: 1

Martin Luther King var kommunist!

Nogle mennesker hævder, at Martin Luther King Jr. ikke var kommunist, selvom han gjorde alt for at fremme kommunistens dagsorden. Det er ligesom at sige, at Hitler ikke var en morder, fordi han ikke rent faktisk gjorde drabet. Martin Luther King Jr. var kommunist! Martin Luther King var tilknyttet 60 kommunistiske fronter. Han tilskyndede åbenlyst til vold under banneret "ikke -vold." King førte et bizart sexliv, der omfattede chokerende perversion. Den 31. januar 1977 opnåede Coretta Scott King en føderal domstolsordre, der i 50 år beseglede 845 sider FBI -optegnelser om hendes mand, & quot fordi dens frigivelse ville ødelægge hans ry! & quot Stadig en fej, spineless kongres stemte for at gøre Kings fødselsdag til en national helligdag. Dette burde være en forargelse for alle kristne. King Holiday -loven skal ophæves!

Martin Luther Kings livshistorie er chokerende og skammelig fra start til slut. Han blev født med navnet Michael King den 15. januar 1929. I 1935 besluttede hans prædikantfar, & quotDaddy & quot King, at navngive sig selv efter den store protestantiske reformator Martin Luther. Han meddelte sin menighed, at han fremover skulle hedde Martin Luther King og hans søn Martin Luther King, Jr. Således er hans søns rigtige navn Michael King! Ferien skal egentlig kaldes & quotMichael & quot King Day!

Det var ikke nogle & quotright-winger & quot, der havde King's kontor og hotelværelser bugged. Denne ordre blev underskrevet af daværende amerikanske statsadvokat Bobby Kennedy den 10. oktober 1963. Beviser beviste, at King var under direkte ordrer fra sovjetiske spioner og finansieret af kommunistpartiet. Kennedy -tapingerne fortsatte i 5 år og udviklede også chokerende afsløringer vedrørende Kings seksuelle praksis.

Afroamerikaner, Bayard Rustin, er tidligere arrangør for Young Communist League. Han tilbragte 60 dage i et fængsel i Californien på en dom fra 1953 for at have udført grimme homoseksuelle handlinger offentligt. Han afsonede også 28 måneders fængsel for udkast til unddragelse. I dag betales Rustin af jødiske organisationer for brug af sit navn som & quotsigner & quot annoncer, der opfordrer til "Black-Jewish Unity." Han var Kings sekretær og rådgiver fra 1956 til 1960. I denne periode deltog Rustin i Kommunistpartiets nationale konvent i 1957 som en & kvoteret observatør. & quot King kaldte ham en & kvote genial, effektiv og dedikeret arrangør. & quot Det var Rustin, der introducerede King for en sovjetisk spion ved navn Stanley D. Levison. Han var advokat i New York og næstformand for N.Y. Council of the American Jewish Congress.

Levisons job var at hvidvaske det tilskud på 1 million dollars, som Sovjet Rusland gav til finansiering af det amerikanske kommunistparti. Levison viste sig at være vigtig for finansielle, organisatoriske og PR -tjenester. Efter Kings død beskrev hans kone, Coretta Scott King Levisons rolle som, & altid arbejdet i baggrunden, har hans bidrag været uundværligt. & quot Levison skrev en nekrolog til King og beskrev Amerika som en & quotnation ihærdigt racistisk. syg af vold. og ætsende med fremmedgørelse. Borgerrettighedsfrigørelseskampen er det mest positive og givende arbejdsområde, nogen kunne opleve. & Quot

De penge, som Sovjetunionen sendte til Levison, kom fra en jøde ved navn Isidore G. Needleman. Han var en KGB -hemmelig politiagent, der frontede som officer i AMTORG, handelsselskabet i New York City, der køber amerikanske varer til forsendelse til Rusland. Der er så mange jøder i det kommunistiske parti, at FBI hyrede to jødiske brødre, Morris Childs og Jack Childs, som spioner planlagt inde i kommunistpartiet. I 30 år var Morris Childs tidligere medlem af kommunistpartiets nationale komité og fungerede engang som redaktør for Daily Worker. Childs rapporterede, at efter jøden William Weiner, der var kasserer for kommunistpartiet, var det Stanley Levison, der overtog denne vitale post.

Hans [Martin Luther King Jr.'s] nærmeste rådgiver Stanley Levison var kommunist, ligesom hans assistent Jack O Dell. Robert og senere John F. Kennedy advarede ham gentagne gange om at stoppe med at forbinde sig selv med sådanne undergravere, men det gjorde han aldrig. Han talte ofte for kommunistiske frontgrupper som National Lawyers Guild og Lawyers for Democratic Action. King deltog endda i seminarer på The Highlander Folk School, en anden kommunistisk front, som underviste i kommunistisk taktik, som han senere anvendte.

KILDE: http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/epstein9.html

I 1945 blev Internationalt Arbejdsforsvar og National Federation for Constitutional Liberties fusioneret med den marxistisk inspirerede National Negro Congress til at danne Civil Rights Congress (CRC). CRC blev ledet af en åben sort kommunistadvokat ved navn William L. Patterson, der forsvarede minoritetshumoer og venstreorienterede radikaler. King kendte, respekterede og arbejdede med kommunister, herunder medlemmer af det kommunistiske parti USA. Han var en beundrer af Ben Davis, en medfødt i Atlanta, der blev valgt & quot det første kommunistiske rådsmedlem fra Harlem. & Quot Han beundrede bestemt William L. Patterson, en kommunistisk leder med tilnavnet & quotMr. Borgerlige rettigheder. & Quot


King Afbilledet Med Tre Toprøde

Det foto til venstre of King er ekstremt vigtig, da den identificerer King med Carl og Ann Branden. De er livslange kommunistpartisaktivister ud af Louisville, Kentucky.

Begge var ledere i SCEF, Carl Branden blev dømt for kriminel oprejsning i 1954. Han og hans kone købte et hjem til sorte i et hvidt kvarter for at tilskynde til racevold.

Senere blev de anklaget for at bombe det samme hus for at vinde sympati for deres sag og for at skaffe penge.

Ann Braden er i dag grundlægger af det Atlanta -baserede & quotCenter for Democratic Renewal & quot; som udtværer konservative patrioter.

Nedenfor er en fotostat af en SCEF (Southern Conference Education Fund) check til King underskrevet af Dombrowski og Benjamin Smith, som var registreret udenlandsk agent for Fidel Castro.


Foto af King på Kommunistpartiets træningsskole

På denne side er billedet taget den 2. september 1957 af King, der gik på Highlander Folk School, som kommunistpartiet opererede i Monteagle, Tennessee Identificeret på billedet er

Nr. 2, Abner Berry, medlem af kommunistpartiets centralkomité og skribent for & quotDaily Worker, & quot

Nr. 3, Aubrey Williams, kommunistpartiets agent og præsident for Southern Conference Educational Fund (SCEF) en rød front, der organiserer sorte i sydlige stater.

Nr. 4, Miles Horton, leder af Highlander Folk School King, blev opført på skolernes brevpapir som en & quotsponsor. & Quot

Highlander -skolen blev finansieret af Julius Rosenwald -fonden. På et tidspunkt stod Rosenwald i spidsen for Sears Roebuck Co. Han brugte 22 millioner dollars på at finansiere borgerrettighedsgrupper. Hans datter Edith Stern fortsatte med at give penge til SCEF og Highlander Folk School efter hendes fars død. Hendes mand, Alfred stern fra New Orleans, flygtede til Rusland lige før han skulle blive anholdt på grund af spion.

Kommunister forfremmet konge

En række kommunister, der forlod partiet, har rapporteret, at de blev beordret til at gøre alt inden for deres magt for at støtte kongens aktiviteter. En sort kvinde, Julia Brown, var kommunist i Cleveland i ni år. Hun sagde & quot

Vi fik besked på at promovere King, forene negre og hvide bag ham og gøre ham til en slags nationalhelt. Vi skulle se på King som leder i denne kamp, ​​sagde kommunisterne, fordi han var på vores side. Mens jeg var i festen, lærte jeg, at King gik på en kommunistisk træningsskole, at flere af hans hjælpere var kommunister, og at han modtog midler fra kommunister og tog anvisninger fra dem. Han var en af ​​deres største helte. & Quot

US Congressional Record af 30. marts 1965 citerer Karl Preussen, en FBI -kontraspion inde i kommunistpartiet som sværger: & quotOp alle disse (kommunistpartis) møder var pastor Martin Luther King altid angivet som den person, kommunisterne skulle samles om. King har enten været medlem af eller villigt accepteret støtte fra over 60 kommunistiske fronter. King accepterede støtte fra kommunistiske fronter, enkeltpersoner og organisationer, der går ind for kommunistiske årsager. & Quot

Salt Lake byråds meddelelse om, at de omdøber hovedboulevarden, 600 syd, efter Martin Luther King (Daily Herald, 8/11/93, s. B-3) er endnu et eksempel på den farlige tendens til at gøre en helt ud af en af ​​Amerikas mest højlydte forrædere.

Jeg udtrykker ikke mening, men fakta baseret på dokumenterede beviser for, at Martin Luther King kraftigt blev fremmet af det sovjetfinansierede CPUSA (USA's kommunistparti) for at fremme en voldelig polarisering af amerikanere langs racemæssige linjer (opdeling og erobring). Den efterfølgende hævning af Martin Luther til stadig mere forhøjet heltestatus er kun en opfølgning af det indledende motiv. (Jeg har ikke til hensigt at behandle løgnen om, at kommunismen er død, "andet end blot at bemærke, at denne særlige sag endnu er et bevis på, at undergravningen af ​​vores elskede land fortsætter og er alarmerende vellykket.)

Her er et eksempel på det dokumenterede bevis, som jeg taler om. Jeg refererer til et essay af Evans-Raymond Pierre, en indfødt sort i New York City, der fik en grad i statskundskab og historie ved University of Vermont. I den citerer han fra et medlem (FBI -anlæg) i CPUSA, der vidnede for et senatets retsudvalg i 1979, at & quotthe [kommunistiske] celler, som jeg var tilknyttet i Cleveland, konstant blev bedt om at rejse penge til Martin Luther Kings aktiviteter og til støtte hans bevægelse. Mens jeg var i kommunistpartiet, som en loyal amerikansk neger, vidste jeg, at Martin Luther King var tæt forbundet med kommunistpartiet. & quot

Et andet eksempel på M.L. Kings kommunistiske støtte og bånd dokumenteret af Pierre var hans nære tilknytning til Stanley David Levison, som & kvoterede King i organisationsspørgsmål og politisk strategi, skrev nogle af hans taler og rådgav ved ansættelse af personale til at bemanne King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference. & Quot På det tidspunkt , Blev Levison & quot; bevidst brugt som ledning for sovjetiske midler & quot til CPUSA, og også & quotassisted til at styre de hemmelige partikasser. & Quot

»Endnu et eksempel på at kalde ondt, godt. Lad os se, om vi ikke kan overbevise byrådet om at ændre denne beslutning.

Enhver, der ønsker at gennemgå yderligere bevis for M. L. Kings nære forbindelser med CPUSA, opfordres til at anmode om gratis (hvis du bestiller inden for en måned) genoptryk af Pierre's essay fra Den nye amerikaner, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, WI 54913. (13. januar 1986.)

Sterling D. Allan, Fountain Green, UT
og Brian Gibson, Provo, Utah

Martin Luther King Jr. var en skummel minister, en Satan-inspireret bedrager. IKKE EN KRISTEN!

Martin Luther King Jr. UDSTILLET! (meget mere om kongens kommunistiske aktiviteter)


Mere om film

J. Edgar lader også en slutte, at Hoovers misbilligelse af King var altomfattende. På et tidspunkt i billedet kommer den angiveligt undertrykte Hoover uhindret, fulminerende mod King, og - i en risibel fiktionalisering - udarbejder han endda et giftpennebrev til ministeren, der lader som om han er sort. "Du ved, at du er en fuldstændig svindel og et stort ansvar over for alle os negre," dikterer filmens Hoover. "Hvide mennesker i dette land har deres egen bedrageri nok, men jeg er sikker på, at de ikke har en på nuværende tidspunkt, der er i nærheden af ​​din ligemand."

Filmskaberne ønsker naturligvis, at seerne anerkender, at Hoover ironisk nok beskriver sig selv. Sandheden er, at Hoover aldrig sendte et sådant brev til King. Det meste af Hoovers animus over for borgerrettighedslederen kan spores til en erklæring, som King afgav til pressen, der indebar, at FBI -agenter i sydlige stater var for "venlige" med segregationister og lokalt politi. "Dr. Martin Luther King er den mest berygtede løgner i landet," svarede Hoover til journalister i november 1964.

King forsøgte at præcisere sine bemærkninger til FBI -direktøren og mødtes med Hoover i Washington et par uger senere. "Jeg vil forsikre dig om, at jeg er blevet alvorligt citeret forkert i sagerne om lur mod FBI," sagde King til ham.

På mødet forsvarede Hoover sine agenter og sagde, at de kun interagerede med sydlige politifolk, fordi de havde brug for oplysninger, der kunne bruges til at opbygge juridiske sager til bekæmpelse af føderale krænkelser af borgerlige rettigheder. "Jeg vil gerne give dig et råd, doktor King," fortalte Hoover ham. "En af de største ting, du kunne opnå for dine folk, ville være at tilskynde dem til at registrere og stemme. Registratorer i Syd skal nu være meget mere forsigtige end tidligere, og der er færre forsøg på at forhindre negere i at registrere. Vi overvåger registrerings- og afstemningsprocedurer meget omhyggeligt. " Dette fra den "uhyrlige" FBI -direktør, som J. Edgar's manuskriptforfatter kaldte for nylig Hoover.

På trods af bruddet mellem Hoover og King forblev Hoover en rigtig FBI -mand - han var ingen Joe McCarthy, som filmkarakteren Hoover fornærmer som en "opportunist". Stadig de fleste mennesker, der ser J. Edgar ville aldrig vide det, da segregeringsguvernører som Ross Barnett (Mississippi) og George Wallace (Alabama) kæmpede imod lov om borgerrettigheder ved at smøre Martin Luther King for angiveligt at være en del af en "kommunistisk træningsskole" i Tennessee og hævde, at King "tilhørte flere kommunistiske organisationer end nogen mand i USA, "var det Hoovers bureau, der frembragte oplysninger, der modbeviser sådanne løgne.

Som forfatteren Taylor Branch afslører i sin historie om borgerrettighedsbevægelsen, under "frihedssommeren" i 1964, modtog Hoover oplysninger, der indikerede, at det sandsynligvis var hvide supremacister, der ville dræbe Martin Luther King når som helst. Hoover autoriserede FBI -agenter til at ledsage den uvidende konge på en flyvetur i syd for at sikre hans beskyttelse - det er lige hvad en FBI -mand ville gøre. Fordi de fleste nu ser ud til at lære historie fra filmene, er det ærgerligt, at en temmelig fortællende scene som den ikke var i dette script.


JFK og RFK havde ret til at aflytte MLK

Kennedy -administrationen engagerede sig i en utilgivelig handling af regeringens indtrængen, da den aflyttede Dr. Martin Luther King. Denne opfattelse er bagt ind i historiebøgerne, og Jimmy Carter gentog netop dette tema i sin lovtale til Coretta Scott King. Men sandheden er, at den berømte borgerrettighedsleder bragte disse aflytninger på sig selv. Dette er ikke en ufortalt historie, lige så meget som en glemt historie.

Den kolde krig var i fuld gang i slutningen af ​​1963, da Bobby Kennedy godkendte det første aflytning af King. På JFK ’s vagt havde Khrusjtjov sat Berlinmuren op og havde næsten fremprovokeret en atomudveksling ved at indføre atomvåbnede missiler i Cuba. War of National Liberation ” blev fuldt stooket af sko-punderen i Kreml. Alligevel havde King, der allerede var en magtfuld borgerrettighedsfigur, omgivet sig med flere radikale rådgivere, herunder mindst to mangeårige medlemmer af kommunistpartiet.

Stanley Levison var en af ​​dem. Han har muligvis været, som King ’s venlige biograf, David Garrow undertiden antyder, King ’s mest betroede rådgiver fra 1956 til borgerrettighedslederens død i 1968. Levison, et vigtigt CP -medlem, var også ansvarlig for at placere på bestyrelse for King ’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference Hunter Pitts (Jack) O ’Dell, der blev medlem af det nationale udvalg i det amerikanske kommunistparti i 1959. Det var de uomtvistelige fakta, der til sidst fik Kennedy -administrationen til at aflytte King.

Levison ’s nærhed til King er uden tvivl. Bevis kan findes i FBI-filerne om Levison —, hvoraf mange er i denne forfattere besiddelse — og i Garrow ’s vidunderlige værker, herunder hans 1986 Pulitzer Prize-vindende biografi om King, Bearing the Cross. Garrow, med yderligere frigivne FBI-filer til rådighed, fokuserede også skarpt på Levison-King-forholdet i juli-august 2002-udgaven af ​​Atlantic Monthly.

Her er noget af det, vi ved: Levison mødte King for første gang i 1956. “ [A] et særligt forhold blomstrede hurtigt, ” siger Garrow, og “ fra slutningen af ​​1950'erne indtil King ’s død i 1968 , det var uden tvivl King ’s nærmeste venskab med en hvid person. ”

Garrison skriver, at Levison “ i april 1957 rådgav King om den første store nationale tale, som King ville holde — fra trinene i Lincoln Memorial den 17. maj. I løbet af de efterfølgende måneder forhandlede Levison en bogkontrakt for King ’s egen beretning om Montgomery-boykotten, Stride Toward Freedom, og tilbød derefter King line-by-line kritik og hjælp til at redigere og polere bogen & rsquos tekst. ”

Levison tog også ansvaret for andre opgaver, siger Garrow, “ skifter fra at skrive King & rsquos indsamlingsbreve til at udarbejde sine selvangivelser. ”

Garrow bemærker også: Den 4. januar 1962 informerede Isadore Wofsy, et topmedlem i kommunistpartiet, som Levison var i kontakt med, undercover FBI -agent Jack Childs om, at Levison havde haft en stor hånd med at skrive en konge -tale leveret til AFL -CIO & rsquos årlige nationale stævne en måned før. ”

King og Levison “ kom tættere på med årene, ” Garrow informerer os, hvor King ivrigt søger Levison & rsquos råd om utallige spørgsmål, både store og små. Selv efter at King var blevet advaret af embedsmænd fra Kennedy -administrationen om Levison's baggrund, nægtede King at opgive sin gode ven og rådgiver.

Levisons indflydelse med King var klar og uafviselig, ligesom hans engagement i kommunismen var. Morris og Jack Childs, der selv havde været engagerede kommunister i 1930'erne og 1940'erne, vidste alt om Levison. Childs -brødrene var i 1948 blevet disenchanterede over kommunismen, men det lykkedes at trænge ind i partiets højeste række i begyndelsen af ​​1950'erne, denne gang som FBI -informanter. Deres bemærkelsesværdige eskapader, herunder Morris & rsquos kritiske møder med centrale Kreml -ledere, bliver fortalt i den autoritative Operation Solo, skrevet af afdøde John Barron og udgivet af Regnery (et søsterfirma Human Events). Barron, der talte russisk, var en kendt ekspert i KGB og sovjetiske modspionageaktiviteter.

By 1946, Barron’s book informs us, Levision, then 34, had “gained admission into the inner circle of the Communist underground.” Barron writes that Jack Childs informed the FBI in the 1950s that Levison “helped establish party business fronts and collected money from party ‘angels’ in Hollywood and on Wall Street.” In 1955, Phillip Bart, who “brought” Morris back into the party (without, of course, realizing Morris was working for the FBI), told Jack that Levison and his twin brother, Roy, were now in charge of the CP&rsquos party finances.

Jack, in 1958, reported a conversation with James Jackson, the party secretary in charge of “Negro and Southern Affairs.” Jackson claimed that he and Eugene Dennis, then the top CP leader, had conferred with the “most secret and guarded people who are in touch with, consulting with and guiding [Martin] Luther King.” He didn’t mention any names, but said they were “party guys” and left the unmistakable impression that he was talking about Levison and O’Dell.

On May 6, 1960, Jack Childs, according to Barron, reported to the Bureau: “Hunter Pitts [Jack] O’Dell is working full time in connection with the King mass meeting to be held in Harlem on May 17, 1960. Working closely with O&rsquoDell are Stanley and Roy Levison. … CP policy at the moment is to concentrate upon Martin Luther King.”

Levison, according to Garrow, “recruited” O’Dell back in 1959 to become the “administrator of SCLC’s two-person New York Office…” When asked by the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1958 if he was a Communist Party member, O&rsquoDell hid behind the 5th Amendment. In December 1959, according to an FBI report, he was elected a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party.

In mid-June of 1962, the bug in Levison’s office picked up Levison’s own description of how he, in Garrow’s words, “had recommended that King hire Jack O’Dell as his administrative assistant in Atlanta.” (Nothing came of that recommendation, but Levison was clearly comfortable in trying to elevate O’Dell’s influence. )

An FBI surveillance team, notes Barron, also discovered another Levison connection when he was advising King: “KGB officer Victor Lessiovsky, a sophisticated and engaging operative well known to Western security services.” Lessiovsky, according to Barron, “specialized in influence operations, that is, in inducing influential foreigners to do, wittingly or unwittingly, what the Soviet Union wanted them to do.”

Thus, when Martin Luther King began plans for his famous 1963 March on Washington, JFK and his brother, Bobby, were very concerned, with good reason. They had already sent warnings to King to separate from both Levison and O&rsquoDell through several top administration officials. Then, in June 1963, President Kennedy himself, after a meeting with black leaders at the White House, met alone with King in the Rose Garden.

JFK had been fearful for some time that the Soviets may have been manipulating King through the American CP and through Levison in particular. He warned King that he was in danger of losing his civil rights cause altogether because of his loyalty to both Levison and O’Dell. “They&rsquore Communists,” he informed King, according to Garrow&rsquos account. “You’ve got to get rid of them.” King never severed his relations with either man, even though he pledged that he would and lied about doing so to Kennedy officials on several occasions.

And that’s why the Kennedy brothers felt it necessary to tap King’s telephone. They would have been derelict in their duties if they hadn&rsquot.

Martin Luther King is remembered by Americans for his achievements in furthering equal rights for blacks, but many believe he was also manipulated by the far-left, including CP members. When he firmly hitched the civil rights movement to the “anti-war” movement during the Vietnam war, he appeared to take the side of the violent Communists in Hanoi rather than of those who genuinely opposed the conflict in that country for religious reasons. He labeled this nation as “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today,” accused President Johnson of lying about Hanoi’s “peace” overtures and likened this country to Nazi Germany for trying to defend South Vietnam from a Communist takeover.


What is Hawking radiation?

The late Stephen Hawking proposed the existence of thermal radiation that spontaneously emanates from black holes. He hypothesized the radiation was created by quantum effects near the black hole's event horizon, the boundary beyond which no light can escape. Furthermore, Hawking believed that over time, the radiation would result in enough energy and mass being taken away from a black hole to make it evaporate completely.

Hawking Radiation www.youtube.com

In the new paper, the researchers calculated the likely mass constraints of PBHs that could be composed of dark matter. Specifically, they concluded that PBHs similar to an asteroid in size (around 1017 grams to 1022 grams) could "make up all the dark matter" in the universe. Furthermore, the study looked at new techniques for finding dark matter, examining the possibility of using MeV (megaelectron volt) gamma-ray telescopes to detect Hawking radiation coming from the primordial black holes.

In an interview with Phys.org, researcher Adam Coogan explained why their approach could work.

"The main idea behind our work was to think about a particular way of looking for asteroid-mass PBHs," Coogan shared. "Light PBHs are expected to emit Hawking radiation consisting of a mix of photons and other light particles, such as electrons and pions. Telescopes can then search for this radiation by observing our galaxy or other galaxies."


The Beast as Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people’s weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist “historians” rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official “saints.” Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations. Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called “Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.” King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays — they share the generic-sounding “President’s Day.”) A federal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King.

King’s Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman’s Holiday for a Cheater:

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow. And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: “Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.” King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of The Finding of God. Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton. King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”

Ifølge The Martin Luther King Papers, in King’s dissertation “only 49 per cent. of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!

I The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: “King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….”

Redaktionen af The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that “…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….”

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us “…actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King’s record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public.”

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. Fra New York Times of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, “There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.” However, despite its finding, the committee said that “No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.”

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the titles “reverend” and “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the Los Angeles Times reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, Arbejderen, openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1964.

Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis Globe-Democrat of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, immediately hired him again as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the Richmond News-Leader of September 27, 1963.

In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Beijing, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1964 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern United States, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled Negroes With Guns. The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than “Martin Luther King, Jr.” It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “…we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.”

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, Stride Toward Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.”

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.

Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent. for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.

In fact, an outfit called the “National Civil Rights Museum” in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the occupants of those rooms. That—according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold—would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? “Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” spent his last night on Earth having sexual intercourse with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau had seen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.

Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King’s supposedly “non-violent” marches, Sullivan’s probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King’s only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.”

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.

J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King’s real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in—the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King’s writings as a new book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King.

I want you to start to think for yourselves.

I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King?

What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero?

What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal?

What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?

You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

Bibliografi

1. Hoffman, Michael A., Holiday for a Cheater, (Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992)

2. Steffgen, Kent H., The Bondage of the Free, (Vanguard Books, Berkeley, California, 1966)

3. Garrow, David J., The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., (W. W. Norton & Co., New York City, 1981)

Further information on King’s Communist connections and the FBI surveillance of Stanley Levison can be found in the Congressional Record.

Just click here to download a high-resolution PDF flier of this exposé, print it out in any quantity desired, and get the truth out to hundreds or thousands of people in your community.


This Photo of MLK Kneeling Has New Power Amid the NFL Protests. Here’s the Story Behind It

A photo of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and other marchers for civil rights kneeling in prayer Selma, Alabama has gone viral in the wake of President Donald Trump’s ongoing criticism of professional athletes who kneel in protest during the National Anthem.

The image, taken in 1965, shows King leading a prayer after a group of protesters were arrested during a march to the Dallas County Alabama courthouse. Around 250 people were arrested during the demonstration, which was part of a push to get African Americans in Selma registered to vote. Among those praying with King is Ralph Abernathy, a fellow minister and leader of the Civil Rights movement.

The photo been shared by both the Martin Luther King, Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change and the civil rights leader’s youngest child, Bernice King, on social media.

The sports world’s kneeling controversy began last year, when former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick took a knee as the National Anthem was played before football games in protest of the unequal treatment that people of color face in the U.S.

“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,” Kaepernick told NFL Media last August.

Since then, other players across the National Football League have taken to sitting out the national anthem as well. That act of civil disobedience has drawn the ire of many, including President Donald Trump, who argue the players are disrespecting the American flag and the men and women who serve in the U.S. military.

&ldquoWouldn&rsquot you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, &lsquoGet that son of a bitch off the field right now, out,'” Trump said at a political rally on Friday. “He&rsquos fired. He&rsquos fired!”

Those who support the protests, including the younger King, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the King Center, say the root issue is the fact that people of color are still fighting for equal treatment under the law.


Why Brazil’s World War II force had the best unit patch

Posted On April 29, 2020 15:49:45

Brazil’s contribution to the Allied war effort is extraordinary but often forgotten. Though Brazil originally tried to remain neutral in the conflict, the United States eventually encouraged the country to break off relations with the Axis powers. As a result, German u-boats began to sink Brazilian shipping and kill Brazilian citizens.

As a result, Brazil entered the war on the Allied side in August 1942, ready to punish the Axis for killing Brazilians.

The Brazilian Expeditionary Force numbered some 25,000 men, the only ally from South America to contribute troops to the war effort. Brazil’s fighting force would play a crucial role in some of the critical European battles to come, in a way no one thought possible. Bogstaveligt talt.

Some commenters said the world would more likely see snakes smoking than see Brazilian troops on a World War II battlefield. So when the BEF showed up to deploy with the U.S. Fifth Army, they looked a lot like the Americans in their fatigues, save for one important detail: a shoulder patch, featuring a snake smoking a pipe.

Now proudly calling themselves the “Smoking Cobras,” the Brazilian forces were ready to fight the Italians and Germans anywhere they were needed. Meanwhile, the Brazilian Navy and Air Force were getting their revenge on the Axis Navy and Air Forces that had so damaged Brazilian shipping. After losing 36 or more ships before entering the war, they lost only three ships afterward. And despite Brazil’s Air Force only flying five percent of the war’s air sorties, they managed to destroy 85 percent of Axis ammo dumps, 36 percent of Axis fuel depots, and 28 percent of Axis transportation infrastructure.

Back on the ground, the “Smoking Cobras” of the Brazilian Expeditionary Force were fighting the Italians and Germans in the Italian Campaign in 1943 and making short work of their enemy while providing much-needed rest for units that had been fighting for months.

A Brazilian mortar crew fires their 81mm mortar in support of infantry in the Sassomolare area of the Fifth Army front north of Florence, April 1945.

The three regimental combat teams that comprised the BEF took on the German 148th Division, soundly defeating them at the Battle of Collecchio. Other victories came in succession: Camaiore, Monte Prano, Serchio Valley. The Brazilians also took down the Italian Monte Rosa, San Marco, and Italia divisions. In all, they captured more than 15,000 prisoners and took a further 500 out of action in later campaigns.

They retreated only when they ran out of ammunition, and their losses in Italy numbered just north of 450 killed in action.

Mere om We are the Mighty

More links we like

MIGHTY HISTORY

And finally tonight, to Jeffrey Brown for a Martin Luther King Day, new book conversation.

JEFFREY BROWN:

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, a key piece of an immensely fertile period of civil rights activity and legislation. Two figures towered over that period: Martin Luther King Jr. and Lyndon Baines Johnson. A new book titled "Judgment Days" tells the story of these two leaders and of what it calls the laws that changed America.

Its author is Nick Kotz, a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and writer. Also joining us is Roger Wilkins, professor of history at George Mason University. He served in various posts in the Johnson administration. Nick Kotz, the first words of your book are "they were unlikely partners." Why don't we start there. Why unlikely?

They were unlikely for a number of reasons. Johnson was a man of Washington. To him, power was exercised from Washington and if you wanted to do business in Washington, you came there and petitioned the government. Dr. King was not only a preacher, he was a great organizer of people in the streets.

He put pressure on the government by arousing public sentiment for things that he wanted changed. Johnson, Kennedy before him, disliked more than anything else street demonstrations because they were volatile, they could produce very up certain&hellip uncertain results. And despite many, many dissimilarities between these two men, King said to Johnson that they did have something deeply in common, and that was a love for the South and their southern roots. But the most important thing they had in common was a passion for equality.

JEFFREY BROWN:

Roger, obviously they were brought together by an historical moment.

ROGER WILKINS:

The moment consisted of more concerted energetic civil rights action than this country has ever seen. And King became the voice for all those people in the streets in the South, but as important as he was, we can't forget that there were just all kinds of wonderful young people in the South so what brought these men together where both of them were being moved by this enormous pressure in the streets and the great talent that had been drawn to the civil rights movement.

JEFFREY BROWN:

So when they were brought together and with their different personalities, what was it like between them? What was their personal relationship?

Their personal relationship was always very formal. These two men were never friends. During this particular battle in almost like a ballet, Johnson and King behind the scenes learned to adjust to each other's moves. And if they had not done so, Selma and the Voting Rights Act could have turned out very differently.

We could have had incredible violence and bloodshed. We could have had Johnson being forced to send in federal troops which he feared would be a second reconstruction. And it was because Johnson and King knew when to push, knew when to pull back, that they were able to bring this off in a peaceful way.

JEFFREY BROWN:

We have a short exchange of a taped conversation between the two of them. It's from 1965. They're talking about building up the black vote. Why don't we listen to that.

LYNDON B. JOHNSON:

There is not going to be anything though, Doctor, as effective as all of them voting. That will get you a message that all the eloquence in the world won't bring because the fellow will be coming to you then instead of you calling him.

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.:

And it's very interesting, Mr. President, to notice that the only states that you did not carry in the South &ndash the five Southern States &ndash had less than 40 percent of the Negroes registered to vote.

That was very interesting to note. I think a recent article from the University of Texas brought this out very clearly so it demonstrates that it is so important to get Negroes registered to vote in large numbers and it would be this coalition of the Negro voter and the popular white vote that would make the new South.

LYNDON B. JOHNSON:

JEFFREY BROWN:

Roger, what I hear is a little bit of the formality that Nick Kotz was talking about but the sort of practical "how do we get things done?"

ROGER WILKINS:

Johnson was more at ease with King than the Kennedy people because they just&hellip these New Englanders just didn't get the kind of rhythm and the cadence and the biblical spirit that King brought even to the most intimate tables where he had discussions with the government.

Johnson had grown up in the South and he knew black people, knew poor people, and so despite his history in the Senate, he was much more at ease with this man and this kind of conversation, but he's also wary of him because as Nick said, we in Washington&ndash even those of us who were pushing from the inside for more vigorous action and wanted the demonstrations to continue &mdash understood that they were a real problem for the politicians who were our bosses.

The nuances in that conversation, including parts that we didn't have time to play, here was the president of the United States who intensely disliked these demonstrations coaching King on how he could make the points of or dramatize the points of this horrible discrimination against blacks trying to vote, and here was Martin Luther King telling Lyndon Johnson how to win the 1968 election.

And the final line in that exchange, where King is telling Johnson if we can get black Americans registered to vote, those black Americans and modern&hellip moderate white Americans can create a new South. They both believed in that vision.

JEFFREY BROWN:

They would have a major falling out over Vietnam. But how do you sum up the legacy of what they did in the period that you're describing?

The legacy that they accomplished was to abolish official government authorized segregation and discrimination in this country. That was so important. What they could not accomplish&ndash and despite the differences over Vietnam&ndash Johnson and King were both&hellip it was a tragic ending to this story because neither Johnson nor King could deal with riots, could deal with the horrible problems in the cities which required far more than simply ending segregation laws. They were both very frustrated about that.

ROGER WILKINS:

Certainly, the jewel in their crown of these men was the Voting Rights Act. The tragedy is that Nick's book talks about a conversation between Sen. Russell of Georgia and Johnson early in Johnson's presidency when Johnson acknowledges to Russell that the Vietnam War, he believes, is a mistake and not winnable.

Those of us in the government didn't really understand. I think the people in the country didn't know that Johnson knew that and was dealing with this tragic thing. So when King, who he had helped, turned on the war, he felt utterly betrayed.

I agree with that. At the very end, although they had broken, they were very bitter about each other, Johnson did the day after King died used King's death and that horrible tragedy to get yet another civil rights law through the Congress, which was the 1968 fair housing law. So no matter which kind of personal animosities existed between him and individual black or white leaders, Johnson was devoted to the goal of equal rights.

JEFFREY BROWN:

All right. Nick Kotz's new book is called "Judgment Day." Mr. Kotz and Roger Wilkins, thanks very much.


Se videoen: CULTE 10H00 AM DU DIMANCHE 12 SEPTEMBRE 2021 DIMANCHE DE LA FAMILLE